The use of Composite right/left handed (CRLH) metamaterial based transmission lines (TL) for high frequency applications can improve the magnetic field intensity and uniformity. This can be achieved independent from its physical length, contrary to the traditional microstrip TL. In this work we compare the |B1| and |E|-field of the CRLH TL with a common microstrip TL when used in an array of two elements. Three arrays with different lengths were compared, resulting in better field uniformity for the case of the CRLH TL.
By means of electro-magnetic (EM) simulations (Sim4Life, ZMT) the |B1|- and |E|-field for each array configuration were acquired on a phantom of 50 × 80 × 255 mm size and separated from the TLs by 10 mm. The electrical properties of the phantom were 0.4133 S·m-1 for conductivity and 43.77 relative permittivity. The dielectric used for the TL had conductivity and permittivity 0.0001 S·m-1 and 2.2 respectively.
The TLs on this study were terminated with a short circuit (ZL=0). Each of the CRLH TL were tuned to 300 MHz with series and parallel capacitors and inductors values of [5.2pF, 2.8pF, 35nH, 17.5nH], [5.6pF, 3pF, 35nH, 17.5nH ], and [5.3pF, 2.8pF, 35nH, 17.5nH] for the 160 182 and 200 mm length TL.
The |B1|-field for the quarter wavelength MTL and CRLH TLs are show in Fig. 2 for transversal (xy)- and (yz)-axis. To improve the field uniformity a 90 degree phase was applied between the TL. Figure 3 shows the line profile for each of the simulated arrays. The mean and standard deviation of the |B1|-field across the whole volume of the phantom for the MTL and CRLH arrays were [(0.17, 0.035), (0.18, 0.035), (0.17, 0.0334)] and [(0.34, 0.035), (0.37, 0.029), (0.38, 0.023)] mT for the 160, 182, 200 mm length TLs respectively.
The line profiles of the |E|-field on the (xy)-axis for each of the TLs with different length are shown in Fig. 4. The average value of the |E|-field for the MTL was 16.1 ± 4.4 V·m-1 while for the CRLH it was 21.4 ± 5.3 V·m-1.
We compared the performance between MTL and CRLH TL arrays by acquiring the |B1|- and |E|- fields on a phantom. One of the notorious advantages of the CRLH is the ability to produce uniform fields along the (z)-axis despite the physical length of the TL, whereas in the case of the MTL the field tends to decay following the waveform.
When consider the CRLH as Tx coils the |B1|-field seem favorable over the MTL array both in terms of intensity and uniformity, however the |E|-field is also higher than the MTL array. The capabilities of the CRLH as Rx coil has the advantages of high field intensity which can translate to higher SNR compared to the MTL.
1. Wang, C. and Shen, G.X., 2006. B1 field, SAR, and SNR comparisons for birdcage, TEM, and microstrip coils at 7T. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 24(2), pp.439-443.
2. Panda, V., Sohn, S.M., Vaughan, J.T. and Gopinath, A., 2016, June. A Zeroth Order resonant element for MRI transmisson line RF coil. In Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI), 2016 IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 1389-1390). IEEE.
3. Rennings, A., Mosig, J., Bahr, A., Caloz, C., Ladd, M.E. and Erni, D., 2009, March. A CRLH metamaterial based RF coil element for magnetic resonance Imaging at 7 Tesla. In Antennas and Propagation, 2009. EuCAP 2009. 3rd European Conference on (pp. 3231-3234). IEEE.
4. Lai, A., Itoh, T. and Caloz, C., 2004. Composite right/left-handed transmission line metamaterials. IEEE microwave magazine, 5(3), pp.34-50.