Marc Dubois1, Lisa Leroi2, Zo Raolison2, Redha Abdeddaim1, Tryfon Antonakakis3, Julien De Rosny4, Alexandre Vignaud2, Pierre Sabouroux1, Elodie Georget2, Benoit Larrat2, Gérard Tayeb1, Nicolas Bonod1, Alexis Amadon2, Franck Mauconduit5, Cyril Poupon2, Denis Le Bihan2, and Stefan Enoch1
1Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, Institut Fresnel, Marseille, France, 2CEA, DRF, JOLIOT, NeuroSpin, UNIRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif sur Yvette, France, 3Multiwave Technologies AG, Geneva, Switzerland, 4ESPCI Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Institut Langevin, Paris, France, 5Siemens Healthineers, Saint Denis, France
Synopsis
We show that hybridized meta-atom can be used to improve transmit and receive operation in a 7T head birdcage coil equipped with a 32-channel receive array. Our results demonstrates the enhancement of both transmit and receive signal with
the possibility to fill one of the gap usually observed in the brain temporal
lobes. This metamaterial based passive shimming strategy provides a cost
effective, long-lasting, and non-toxic solution without any impact on the
patient’s comfort during the examination.
Background
B1 homogeneity in 7T MRI remains an important challenge in
order to fully benefit from the signal enhancement due to the stronger
magnetization available in ultra-high field scanners. High-dielectric constant pads
have been proposed and optimized for passive shimming purposes1-3. Common formulations of dielectric pads for 7T
applications are based on BaTiO3 mixed with water. They present some
drawbacks such as performance decay over time and toxicity. While previous
studies tackled directly the formulation problem introducing new dielectric
materials and solvent4, we adopted a new approach based on metamaterials5.
We demonstrated that the hybridization of four parallel metallic wires arranged
on a square unit cell provides the ability to control radio frequency field
inside a 7T head birdcage. In the present work, we show that these hybridized
meta-atom (HMA) can be used to improve MRI acquisition in the presence of a
head receive array routinely used for in
vivo MRI protocol.Methods
Four 1-mm-diameter brass wires are assembled at the four corners of a
1-cm-side square to form the HMA structure. It is then placed on the left side of the
phantom between the birdcage used for transmission and the array used for
signal reception. Figure 1 presents a schematics of the arrangement (receive
array not shown). MRI acquisition were performed on a specific anthropomorphic
mannequin phantom (SPEAG, Zurich, Switzerland) filled with HT0300 liquid (ɛ=
45.3, σ= 0.87 S/m) using a SC72 gradient dedicated 1Tx/32Rx proton head coil (Nova
Medical, Wilmington, MA, USA) in a 7T Magnetom MRI scanner (Siemens
Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). Proton density weighted (PDw) images are
obtained in the coronal direction with a gradient echo sequence with TR= 5 s,
TE= 1.9 ms, FA= 90°, BW= 1563Hz/px, FOV= 256 mm2 on 64x64 pixels
(4mm isotropic). Identical parameters were used without any input power to
obtain a measurement of noise statistics. Flip Angle (FA) maps are obtained with
the XFL MRI Sequence6 in the coronal direction with TR= 20 s, TE= 3.06 ms,
FA= 7°, BW=1560 Hz/px for the same FOV and in-plane resolution. Results
SNR
maps are obtained by dividing PDw signal by the standard deviation of noise
obtained in 0V acquisition (no input power). Noise standard deviation (in
arbitrary units) are 90.2 for the reference and 87.6 in presence of HMA. It is
also to be noted that the reference voltage (same in the two acquisitions) was
increased by 10% due to the presence of HMA. SNR maps and profile are presented
in Figure 2. The profile is taken 8 cm below the center of the slice where the
reference case is strongly perturbed. FA maps are obtained and used to
calculate the corrected SNR (cSNR) with the following expression $$$cSNR = SNR /
sinFA$$$. This correction allows to evaluate the SNR gain in reception as the
contribution from the FA distribution is removed. FA maps and cSNR maps are shown in Figure 3.
We also present ratios between the maps obtained before and after introducing
the HMA.Discussion
SNR maps obtained in Figure 2 show an enhancement at the surface close
to the position of the HMA. The main benefit concerns the lower part of the
phantom where strong inhomogenities are observed with the reference case. After
introduction of the HMA, one can observe that the SNR remains constant over 10
cm, closing the gap initially observed between the surface and the center of
the phantom. FA maps and cSNR presented in Figure3 help to understand the
origin of such an improvement. We show that while the HMA influences the FA
distribution allowing us to excite areas that would have remain dark otherwise,
it also has a strong influence on the reception of the signal. Results show a
drastic improvement in terms of transmission efficiency (2-fold) and cSNR
(3-fold) in the gap originally observed close to the HMA location. Meanwhile, an
averaged improvement (+15 %) in FA magnitude and cSNR is observed over a wide
area corresponding to the left half of the phantom.Conclusion
These results show that the HMA structure is perfectly compatible with a
birdcage equipped with a receive array. It has the ability to enhance both
transmit and receive signal with the possibility to fill one of the gap usually
observed in the brain temporal lobes. This metamaterial based passive shimming
strategy provides a cost effective, long-lasting, and non-toxic solution
without any impact on the patient’s comfort during the examination. Future work
will target the global homogenization of FA and SNR in the whole brain with the
use of multiple elements.Acknowledgements
This work has received funding from the European Union Horizon 2020
Research and Innovation program under Grant Agreement No. 736937.References
1A. G. Webb, Concepts Magn. Reson. (2011)
Part A 38A, 148
2T.
P. A. O’Reilly, A. G. Webb, and W. M. Brink, J. Magn.
Reson. (2016)
270, 108-114
3A. L. Neves, et al., Magn. Reson.
Med. (2018) 79, 1753
4Z. Raolison, et al., Proc. Intl.
Soc. Mag. Reson. Med., Paris, France (2018) 26, 2664
5M. Dubois, et al., Phys. Rev.
X (2018)
8, 031083
6A. Amadon, F. Mauconduit, A.
Vignaud, and N. Boulant, Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag.
Reson. Med., Toronto, Canada (2015) 23, 2377