Ying Li1, Cuiping Ren1, Jingliang Cheng1, and Zhizheng Zhuo2
1First affiliated hospital of Zhengzhou university, Zhengzhou, China, 2Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare, Beijing, China
Synopsis
This work investigated
and evaluated the role of intra-voxel incoherent motion(IVIM) MR imaging in
characterizing the bone tumors, which
might be helpful for clinical diagnosis and studies.
Purpose
Recent studies have shown
that IVIM offers a method to reflect the information of perfusion and diffusion in
complex biological tissues in various brain diseases1, liver
diseases2, and breast tumors3, but
rarely used in the study of bone tumors. The purpose of this study is to
investigate the application of IVIM on bone tumors.Methods
73 patients (38 males and 35 females aged
36.8±19.65 years old) with bone tumors (diagnosed according to pathological
biopsy) were included in this study. Based on the WHO Classification of Tumors
of Soft Tissue and Bone (2012) criteria, 73 patients were divided into two
groups: 28 for benign tumors and 45 for malignancies. All the patients were
scanned by MR IVIM sequence based on a 3T MR scanner (Ingenia, Philips
Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands). The IVIM scanning was performed with 10
b-values of 0, 10, 30, 50, 75, 100, 150, 300, 500, 800s/mm2.The
IVIM related parameters of tissue diffusivity (D),
pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D* or Dstar) and perfusion fraction (f) were
calculated by using a Philips development software (Version 3.0).
All the above parameters were measured by drawing ROIs (Region of Interest)
within the periphery of the lesions (P_D, P_Dstar, P_f
short for periphery D, periphery Dstar, periphery f),the center of the
lesions(C_D, C_Dstar, C_f short for center D,
center Dstar, center f). And the all the parameters extracted from
benign and malignant patients were compared by using Mann-Whitney U test with
SPSS software (version 16.0). A P value of less than
0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results
The results revealed that P_Dstar and P_f value in the lesions are
significantly different (P <0.05) between benign and malignant lesions.Discussion
IVIM is a non-invasive functional
imaging based on diffusion MRI technique, which provide simultaneous evaluation
of tumor vascularization and diffusion for the bone
tumor characterization. According to IVIM
principle, Dstar value and f value are perfusion related parameters, while D
value reflect the real water molecule motion. The application of IVIM in other
systems has been reported a lot previously, IVIM related parameters shows a
good diagnostic efficiency1, and perfusion parameters reflect
structure of the microvascular in the tumor. Dstar maps has conformity with the known histologic diagnosis2.
Our study results show that P_Dstar and P_f are able to differentiate benign from malignant
bone tumors, which suggest that D* and f value provide vascularize information of tumor. This would assist doctors to diagnose the
type of the tumor and furtherly was helpful for the corresponding treatment
plan for the tumor. In the future, more patients with different types of bone
tumors will be included in our study to evaluate clinical value of the IVIM
technique and other types of classifiers.Conclusions
IVIM technique is helpful
to evaluate the pathological behavior and provide useful information on the
perfusion and diffusion properties related to bone tumors microenvironment. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1].VincenzaGranata,
Roberta Fusco, Orlando Catalano, et al. Intra-voxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in
diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for Hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with
histologic grade [J].Oncotarget, 2016,[Epub ahead of print].
[2].
C. Federau, R. Meuli, K. O’Brien, et al. Perfusion Measurement
in brain gliomas with intra-voxel incoherent motion MRI [J].Am
J Neuroradiol,2014,35: 256-262.
[3]. Jing
Yuan1, Oi Lei Wong, Gladys G. Lo, et al. Statistical assessment of
bi-exponential diffusion weighted imaging signal characteristics induced by
intra-voxel incoherent motion in malignant breast tumors[J]. Quant Imaging Med
Surg, 2016, 6(4):418-429.