Liping Shi1, Nianyun Li1, Jie Meng1, Han Wang1, Yong Zhang2, Bing Wu2, and Yanhong Xu1
1Radiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China, 2GE Healthcare, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical
applicability of zero echo time (ZTE) MR and compare the image quality between
CT and ZTE imaging of bone tumor and tumor-like lesions. Thirty-six patients
including 18 males and 18 females were recruited to undergo ZTE MR and CT. Agreement
was assessed between raters and Weight Kappa statistics were performed. The
difference of image quality between ZTE and CT imaging were not significant. Our
results confirm that ZTE MR imaging provides accurate imaging of bone
morphology with CT-like contrast that is not available with standard MR
sequences.
Purpose
Bone tumor and tumor-like lesions require comprehensive imaging containing
soft tissue and bone structures. Traditional MR imaging provides superior
soft-tissue contrast but depicts cortical bone as signal void because of bone’s
inherent short T2 relaxation time. Frequently, information for diagnosis or
surgical planning requires patients to undergo multiple cross-sectional
examinations (eg, X-ray plain film, CT and MR) to assess soft-tissue
stabilizers and osseous support of bone tumor and tumor-like lesions.
Clinically, patients with bone neoplastic lesions usually take X-ray plain film
to obtain the whole bone lesions imaging. Then they usually take CT to observe
the local performance of bone destructions. Furthermore, they undergo MR to
show the suffered soft tissue around the bone tumor lesions. Therefore, there
are too many examinations for the patients with bone neoplastic lesions. Zero
echo time (ZTE) can acquire FID signals directly after the RF pulse.1
Inverse-logarithmic rescaling of ZTE images provides contrast between soft
tissue and bone comparable to that of CT.2-3 We sought to apply ZTE
to skeletal imaging of bone tumor and tumor-like lesions. Methods
This prospective study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee
of our hospital. We recruited the patients with bone tumor and tumor-like
lesions between December 2017 and May 2018 in our hospital. Among 36 patients,
18 were males (35±20 years old) and 18 were females (42±20 years old). All patients
underwent biopsy to acquire pathology results. CT was performed by using a GE
Discovery CT750 HD scanner (n = 30) or a GE LightSpeed VCT scanner (n = 6) (GE
Healthcare, Milwaukee, USA). The scan parameters were as follows: 0.625mm
Section thickness, 14–29cm field of view, 0.273–0.559mm pixel size and 512*512
matrix size. MR imaging included coronal inversion-recovery and coronal,
sagittal, and axial fast spin-echo proton density–weighted acquisitions. ZTE
images were acquired using a 3.0-T MR750 scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee,
USA) with the following parameters: 1mm section thickness, 32cm field of view
and 320x320 Matrix size. The total acquisition time was 4 minutes. Two
board-certified musculoskeletal radiologists with more than five years of
experience scored CT and ZTE images. CT and ZTE images scans were coregistered
together and randomly reviewed using a 5-point grading scale: 1. Very poor: Obscured
anatomic detail, not sufficient for diagnosis; 2. Poor: No clear anatomic
details or anatomic details are not sufficiently detectable; 3. Fair: Most
anatomic structures are sufficient for diagnosis, but some pictures are
inadequate for evaluation; 4. Good: Anatomic structures and details are present
in a level that allows proper but not excellent evaluation of the images; 5. Excellent:
Distinct anatomic detail leading to clear and easy evaluation. The statistical
analysis was carried out using Mann–Whitney test and Weight Kappa
statistics . Interpretation of agreement between raters was based on published
standards: 0.00–0.20 indicated slight; 0.21–0.40, fair; 0.41–0.60, moderate;
0.61–0.80, substantial; and 0.81–1, perfect agreement.Results
There were thirteen types of bone tumors and tumor-like lesions in 36
patients, including eight cases of osteosarcoma, eight cases of metastases,
four cases of chondrosarcoma, three cases of giant cell tumor, three cases of
fibrous dysplasia, two cases of schwannoma, two cases of Ewing's sarcoma, one
case bone cyst, one case of synovial sarcoma, one case of liposarcoma, one case
of non-ossifying fibroma, one case of tubular sarcoma and one case of chordoma.
Both of ZTE and CT images show the changes of bone destruction and periosteal
reaction of bone tumors, which can be used for clinical diagnosis (Fig.1).
There was no significant difference between CT and ZTE MR (P = 0.067). The
consistency analysis between the two reviewers in CT group and MR group showed
good consistency (K = 1, K = 0.84).Discussion and Conclusion
In summary, ZTE-MR imaging is another breakthrough in the field of MR
compared with conventional T1, T2 and proton density weighted imaging. This study
provides a new scanning scheme ZTE, which is similar to the contrast of CT
images. The results show that ZTE-MR meets the diagnostic requirements. As an
alternative to CT, ZTE-MR can help patients with bone tumors to simplify the
inspection process.Acknowledgements
Contract grant sponsor: Biomedical Engineering Cross-Research Fund of
Shanghai Jiaotong University; Contract grant number: YG2017QN25.References
1. Weiger M, Hennel F, Pruessmann KP. Sweep MRI with
algebraic reconstruction. Magn Reson Med 2010;64:1685–1695.
2. Breighner RE, Endo Y, Konin GP, et al. Technical
developments: zero echo time imaging of the shoulder: enhanced osseous detail
by using MR imaging. Radiology 2018;286:960–966.
3. Dreher W, Bardenhagen I, Huang L, et al. On the
suppression of background signals originating from NMR hardware components.
Application to zero echo time imaging and relaxation time analysis. Magn Reson
Imaging 2016;34:264–270.