Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease which produces pain and exhibits damage to cartilage, bone marrow and the development of synovitis. Biomarkers are needed to aid patient stratification for developing improved treatment strategies. We have investigated how type II collagen degradation products (CTX2), which are generated during OA, relate to MRI features of knee damage and patient reported pain. CTX2 was strongly related to synovitis and cartilage damage whereas reported pain was more strongly related to depression and BMI. CTX is thus complementary to pain scores as a marker of OA severity.
1. Hunter DJ, Guermazi A, Lo GH et al. Evolution of semi-quantitative whole joint assessment of knee OA: MOAKS (MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score). Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2011;19(8):990-1002.
2. Crema MD, Felson DT, Roemer FW et al. Prevalent cartilage damage and cartilage loss over time are associated with incident bone marrow lesions in the tibiofemoral compartments: the MOST study. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2013;21:306-313.
3. Zhang Y, Nevitt M, Niu J et al. Fluctuation of Knee Pain and Changes in Bone Marrow Lesions, Effusions, and Synovitis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(3):691-9.
4. Dam EB, Marco Loog M, Claus Christiansen C et al. Identification of progressors in osteoarthritis by combining biochemical and MRI-based markers. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(4):R115. doi: 10.1186/ar2774.
5. Kuttapitiya A, Assi L, Laing K, et al. Microarray analysis of bone marrow lesions in osteoarthritis demonstrates upregulation of genes implicated in osteochondral turnover, neurogenesis and inflammation. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(10):1764-1773.
6. Røtterud JH, Reinholt FP, Beckstrøm KJ, et al. Relationship between CTX-II and patient characteristics, patient-reported outcome, muscle strength, and rehabilitation in patients with a focal cartilage lesion of the knee: a prospective exploratory cohort study of 48 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-99.
FIGURE 1
Representative MRI scans acquired at 3T with an 8 channel knee coil. A) Sagittal T1-weighted image with TE 15ms, TR 600ms, 0.3mm in-plane resolution, 3mm slice thickness, 0.25mm slice gap, SENSE factor 1.6. Patient 38, average cartilage damage score (avCD) = 2.3. B) Coronal intermediate weighted image with TE 30m, TR 5000ms, fat-saturation, 0.35mm inplane resolution, 3mm slice thickness, 0.25mm slice gap, SENSE factor 1.4. Patient 58, total Synovitis score (tSyn) =3, average BML score (avBML) = 1.7.
FIGURE 2
Relationship of WOMAC pain scores to A) BMI and B) HADS; for Treatment Group 1 undergoing standard care and Treatment Group 2 who are scheduled for total knee replacement. Bivariate linear regression analysis across both groups: WOMAC_P v. BMI, p=0.000, r=0.487; WOMAC_P v. HADS, p=0.000, r=0.419.
FIGURE 3
WOMAC_P for both early and advanced OA as a function of the summed MOAKS for average cartilage damage and total synovitis and whether BMLs are present (red circles) or not (blue circles). Higher pain is associated with higher levels of cartilage damage (p=0.064) and synovitis (p=0.062). After co-varying for BMI, age and HADS, WOMAC_P only shows a moderate non-significant correlation with tMOAKS (p=0.082), but no
FIGURE 4
CTX2 levels (as boxplots) across early and advanced OA patients as a function of the total of MOAKS for cartilage damage, effusion and Hoffa synovitis in the presence (red bars) or not (blue bars) of BMLs. GLM across all data shows variability of CTX2 as significant for tSyn (p=0.019), tSyn+avCD (p=0.010), but no significance for avBML (p=0.21), or for the presence of BMLs as a fixed factor (p=0.34). Only at low levels of damage with tSyn+avCD < 3 the avBML approaches significance (p=0.091).
FIGURE 5
CTX2 levels (as boxplots) across early and advanced OA patients as a function of the total of MOAKS for cartilage damage, effusion and Hoffa synovitis for Treatment Group 1 undergoing standard care (blue bars) and Group 2 who are scheduled for TKR (red bars). GLM analysis shows variability of CTX2 is significant with tSyn (p=0.023) across both groups with no significance for gender or presence of BMLs (p=0.2); separate analysis shows CTX2 related to tSyn (p=0.054) for Group 1 and with tSyn (0.036) and avCD (p=0.029) for Group 2.