Brendan Lee Eck1, Wei-ching Lo1, Yun Jiang1, Kecheng Liu2, Vikas Gulani3, and Nicole Seiberlich1
1Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States, 2Siemens Healthineers, Cleveland, OH, United States, 3Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, United States
Synopsis
Few of the 32,000 MRI
scanners around the world are equipped with the latest hardware and software
required for advanced imaging. Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF)
presents an opportunity to expand the value of the existing MRI install base as
it is rapid, quantitative, and does not require the latest gradient systems or
multi-channel receiver coils. In this work, we demonstrate repeatable and
reproducible T1 and T2 MRF maps on a 16-year-old MRI scanner as a proof of principle
towards implementing MRF on cheap, legacy MRI scanners.
Introduction
Of the more than 32,000 MRI scanners around the world1, very few are equipped with
the latest hardware and software required for advanced imaging. Improving the
speed and quality of images which can be collected on older scanners could help
to provide state-of-the-art imaging to a larger fraction of the world’s
population. The Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) framework presents an
intriguing opportunity, as MRF is rapid and quantitative, and does not require
the latest multi-channel receiver coils or rapid gradient systems. In this
work, we explore the use of MRF to generate repeatable and reproducible T1
and T2 maps on older MRI scanners as a step towards replacing slow
and qualitative imaging, and towards implementing MRF on low cost scanner
platforms.Methods
The ISMRM/NIST phantom2 was scanned on a 1.5T Magnetom
Symphony (Siemens Healthcare AG, Erlangen, Germany), which was delivered in
2002, and underwent a TIM gradient system upgrade in 2015. This scanner is
equipped with a 4-channel head receive coil and a gradient system with a maximum
strength of 22 mT/m and maximum slew rate of 100 mT/m/s. Maps were obtained
using a FISP-based MRF sequence3,4 with an in-plane spatial
resolution of 1.6×1.6 mm2, 5 mm slice thickness, and scan time of
26s. The spiral trajectory was optimized for the older gradient system by
lengthening the readout to reduce the slew rate, and measured in an axial
orientation prior to the first scan. Scans were repeated five times on this
16-year old scanner, and a test-retest experiment was also performed on two
different days. To test the ability to image at arbitrary orientations, scans
were also acquired with the phantom at a double oblique orientation. T1
and T2 maps for all scans were generated by pattern matching to a
dictionary with T1 ranging from 10 to 4500 ms and T2
ranging from 2 to 1000 ms, corrected for slice profile imperfections5. Average T1 and T2
values within circular ROIs were recorded (T2 up to 300ms2) for all five scans. Across
the scans, average T1 and T2 values were compared to
known reference values using linear correlation coefficients. Measurement variability
was assessed by the coefficient of variation (CV). Reproducibility with the 16-year-old
Symphony scanner was assessed by the correlation of measurements from the two
different days and between the axial and double oblique orientations. Additionally,
a proof-of-concept in vivo brain MRF scan was performed on the Symphony for a
healthy volunteer.Results
T1 and T2 maps from the NIST phantom
in the axial and double oblique orientations are shown in Figure 1. Quantitatively,
the average values measured in both orientations demonstrated a strong
correlation with reference T1 and T2 values (R2≥0.99,
Figure 2). Reproducibility of T1 and T2 measurements
using the 16-year-old Symphony was good across the two different days and the
two scan planes (R2≥0.99, Figure 3a-3b). The correlation
of average T1 and T2 values measured on the Symphony to
previously reported values measured on a modern 1.5T Aera scanner was also
strong (R2≥0.99,
Figure 3c). Average CV values for T1 and T2 were 2.0% and
3.1% (Figure 4). The proof-of-concept in vivo scan resulted in T1
and T2 maps where average white matter T1 and T2 values were 673 ms and
41.0 ms, respectively (Figure 5).Discussion
This study demonstrates that T1 and T2 measurements with MRF
are feasible on legacy MRI hardware. MRF maps were reproducible and comparable
between the double oblique and axial geometries, suggesting that MRF can be
performed across a range of orientations necessary for the clinical setting. The
variability in T1 and T2 measurements was higher on the
16-year-old Symphony than expected on modern MRI scanners, but accurate
parameter maps could be obtain in the NIST phantom with the rapid 26 second
sequence. The proof-of-concept in vivo
maps suggest that potential improvements exist: low-signal regions require
compensation and the initially measured T1 and T2 values may need correction for possible T2* or diffusion
effects due to the limited gradient strength and long spiral readout required. While
preliminary, these findings suggest that accelerated quantitative imaging
strategies such as MRF could be applied to a large fraction of the install base
of MRI scanners, and not just those built to the most modern specifications,
potentially expanding the availability of these technologies to patients in
both the developed and the developing world.Conclusion
MRF is feasible on older scanners with weaker gradient
systems and a relatively small number of receiver coils. This work suggests
that newer data collection and processing approaches like MRF may enable older
scanners to be used for state-of-the-art imaging, providing access to the
benefits of these technologies to a larger population.Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the assistance of Vladmir Nadtotchi,
Ronald Collister, and Naren Nallapareddy in coordinating and performing
the scans. This work was funded in part by the following sources: NIH
R01HL094557, R01DK098503, R01EB016728, C06RR12463-01; NSF CBET 1553441, Siemens
Healthineers (Erlangen, Germany). The content is solely the responsibility of
the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.References
1. OECD
Health Statistics 2018 - OECD. Available at:
http://www.oecd.org/health/health-data.htm. (Accessed: 6th November 2018)
2. Keenan,
K. E. et al. Comparison of T1 measurement using ISMRM/NIST system
phantom | NIST. in (2016).
3. Jiang,
Y., Ma, D., Seiberlich, N., Gulani, V. & Griswold, M. A. MR Fingerprinting
Using Fast Imaging with Steady State Precession (FISP) with Spiral Readout. Magn
Reson Med 74, 1621–1631 (2015).
4. Yu,
A. C. et al. Development of a Combined MR Fingerprinting and Diffusion
Examination for Prostate Cancer. Radiology 283, 729–738 (2017).
5. Ma, D. et al. Slice profile
and B1 corrections in 2D magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine 78, 1781–1789 (2017).