The brain consists of numerous interconnected parallel and hierarchical networks subserving sensory, behavioral and cognitive functions. Resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) connectivity has helped study the complex brain-wide functional networks. Yet, less is known about the role of
Purpose
Resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) connectivity is a robust measurement tool for interrogating complex brain-wide functional networks1-3. Intrinsic rsfMRI connectivity networks and their changes in normal and diseased brains have been increasingly recognized and utilized by the scientific and clinical community as important cognitive performance predictors and disease biomarkers4-7. However, the interpretation of these findings is challenging as the neural bases of rsfMRI connectivity remain unclear. By characterizing changes in cortical interhemispheric rsfMRI connectivity due to corpus callosum congenital defects or damage8-10, several human and animal studies strongly indicate the involvement of subcortical structures (e.g., thalamus) and polysynaptic connections in maintaining rsfMRI connectivity. Thalamus is known to modulate diverse long-range functional neural integration involved in cortico-cortical processing11,12. Such functional role is structurally supported by the massive polysynaptic connections13 and the long-range propagation/coupling of low frequency (<10Hz) spontaneous oscillatory neuronal activities in the brain-wide thalamo-cortical networks14-16. However, few studies directly interrogate the role of thalamus in rsfMRI connectivity. To examine whether and how thalamus contributes to rsfMRI connectivity, here we directly perturb ventral posteromedial thalamus (VPM) and monitor brain-wide rsfMRI connectivity with a multi-modal approach of rsfMRI, neuromodulation (i.e., optogenetic stimulation and pharmacological inhibition) and electrophysiology recordings.Method
Animal preparation: AAV5-CaMKIIα::ChR2(H134R)-mCherry (Figure 1a) was injected to VPM of adult male SD rats (rsfMRI: n=8; electrophysiology: n=9; 200-250g). Four weeks after injection, an opaque optical fiber cannula (d=450μm; for optogenetic stimulation) or a glass capillary tube (d=300μm; for tetrodotoxin, TTX, infusion; n=10) was implanted at VPM. All experiments were performed under 1.0% isoflurane.
rsfMRI and electrophysiology experiments: rsfMRI data was acquired at 7T using GE-EPI. For optogenetic stimulation, 1Hz blue (473nm) light was presented continuously (10% duty cycle, 40mW/mm2; Figure 1b). For TTX infusion, 5μL (5ng/μL) was used (Figure 1c). Standard preprocessing followed by seed-based analysis was applied to map and quantify interhemispheric rsfMRI functional connectivity of primary somatosensory barrel field (S1BF), secondary somatosensory (S2), primary visual (V1) and auditory (A1) cortices. Local field potential (LFP) data was acquired from bilateral S1BF using multi-depth electrodes (16 channels). Interhemispheric connectivity and intrahemispheric/local power spectra were computed for both rsfMRI and LFP data.
Results
Optogenetic stimulation of VPM thalamocortical excitatory neurons increases brain-wide cortical interhemispheric rsfMRI connectivity: 1Hz VPM stimulation enhanced the spatial extent and the strength of interhemispheric rsfMRI connectivity in S1BF, S2, V1 and A1 (Figures 2a, b). Further analyses of the interhemispheric connectivity and intrahemispheric power spectra showed enhancements at the infraslow (0.01-0.1Hz) frequency in both interhemispheric connectivity (Figure 2c) and intrahemispheric rsfMRI BOLD activity (Figure 2d).
Optogenetic stimulation of VPM thalamocortical excitatory neurons increases cortical interhemispheric LFP connectivity of low frequency neural oscillations at all cortical layers: Layer estimation and channel realignment were performed using high-resolution current source density analysis (Figure 3c). Although the deeper cortical layers were observed to have stronger interhemispheric LFP connectivity than the upper layers pre-stimulation (Figures 4a, b), interhemispheric connectivity strengthened significantly at all layers post stimulation, particularly the correlation of slow, delta and theta oscillations (Figures 4a, b). We also observed an increase in the intrahemispheric LFP power of slow, delta and theta oscillations at all layers of bilateral S1BF post-stimulation.
Pharmacological inhibition of VPM thalamocortical neurons decreases brain-wide cortical interhemispheric rsfMRI connectivity: Pharmacological inhibition weakened the spatial extent and the strength of interhemispheric rsfMRI connectivity in S1BF, S2, V1, and A1 (Figures 5a, b). For the interhemispheric connectivity and intrahemispheric/local power spectra, we detected significant decreases in the interhemispheric connectivity (Figure 5c) and the strength of intrahemispheric rsfMRI BOLD activity (Figure 5d) at infraslow (0.01-0.1Hz) frequency post stimulation.
Discussion and Conclusion
Our findings demonstrated that thalamically-evoked low frequency activity by optogenetic stimulation of VPM thalamocortical excitatory neurons increased brain-wide cortical interhemispheric rsfMRI connectivity. Meanwhile, the pharmacological inhibition of VPM thalamocortical neurons decreased interhemispheric rsfMRI connectivity. Together, these results support the role of thalamo-cortical low frequency activities in modulating brain-wide cortical interhemispheric rsfMRI connectivity, highlighting the key contributions of thalamus to rsfMRI connectivity. Previous studies suggest that polysynaptic connections and long-range coupling of low frequency neural oscillations (mainly <10Hz) are related to the thalamic influence on brain-wide rsfMRI connectivity17-19. Indeed, in our previous study, 1Hz VPM stimulation showed downstream neural activity propagation to numerous non-somatosensory regions20. Hence, it is highly likely that neural activity propagates to the visual and auditory cortices, leading to subsequent increase in their respective interhemispheric rsfMRI connectivity21. Taken together, our study presents compelling evidence on the contributions of low frequency neural oscillations in thalamo-cortical networks to brain-wide rsfMRI connectivity.1. Fox, M.D. & Raichle, M.E. Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci 8, 700-711 (2007).
2. Smith, S.M., et al. Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI. Trends Cogn Sci 17, 666-682 (2013).
3. Chan, R.W., et al. Low-frequency hippocampal–cortical activity drives brain-wide resting-state functional MRI connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, E6972-E6981 (2017).
4. Shen, X., et al. Resting-State Connectivity and Its Association With Cognitive Performance, Educational Attainment, and Household Income in the UK Biobank. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging (2018).
5. Drysdale, A.T., et al. Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression. Nat Med 23, 28-38 (2017).
6. Chuang, K.H. & Nasrallah, F.A. Functional networks and network perturbations in rodents. Neuroimage (2017).
7. Miller, K.L., et al. Multimodal population brain imaging in the UK Biobank prospective epidemiological study. Nat Neurosci 19, 1523-1536 (2016).
8. O’Reilly, J.X., et al. Causal effect of disconnection lesions on interhemispheric functional connectivity in rhesus monkeys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 13982-13987 (2013).
9. Zhou, I.Y., et al. Brain resting-state functional MRI connectivity: morphological foundation and plasticity. Neuroimage 84, 1-10 (2014).
10. Tovar-Moll, F., et al. Structural and functional brain rewiring clarifies preserved interhemispheric transfer in humans born without the corpus callosum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 7843-7848 (2014).
11. Hwang, K., Bertolero, M.A., Liu, W.B. & D'Esposito, M. The Human Thalamus Is an Integrative Hub for Functional Brain Networks. J Neurosci 37, 5594-5607 (2017).
12. Sherman, S.M. Thalamus plays a central role in ongoing cortical functioning. Nat Neurosci 19, 533-541 (2016).
13. Sherman, S.M. Functioning of Circuits Connecting Thalamus and Cortex. Compr Physiol 7, 713-739 (2017).
14. David, F., et al. Essential thalamic contribution to slow waves of natural sleep. J Neurosci 33, 19599-19610 (2013).
15. Stroh, A., et al. Making waves: initiation and propagation of corticothalamic Ca2+ waves in vivo. Neuron 77, 1136-1150 (2013).
16. Latchoumane, C.-F., Ngo, H.-V., Born, J. & Shin, H.-S. Thalamic Spindles Promote Memory Formation during Sleep through Triple Phase-Locking of Cortical, Thalamic, and Hippocampal Rhythms. Neuron 95, 424-435 (2017).
17. Marieke L. Schölvinck, A.M., Frank Q. Ye, Jeff H. Duyn, and David A. Leopold. Neural basis of global resting-state fMRI activity. PNAS 107, 10238-10243 (2010).
18. Catie Chang, D.A.L., Marieke Louise Schölvinck, Hendrik Mandelkow, Dante Picchioni, Xiao Liu, Frank Q. Ye, Janita N. Turchi, and Jeff H. Duyn. Tracking brain arousal fluctuations with fMRI. proceedings of the national academy of sciences 113, 4518-4523 (2016).
19. Turchi, J., et al. The Basal Forebrain Regulates Global Resting-State fMRI Fluctuations. Neuron 97, 940-952 e944 (2018).
20. Leong, A.T., et al. Long-range projections coordinate distributed brain-wide neural activity with a specific spatiotemporal profile. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, E8306-E8315 (2016).
21. Liang, M., Mouraux, A., Hu, L. & Iannetti, G.D. Primary sensory cortices contain distinguishable spatial patterns of activity for each sense. Nat Commun 4, 1979 (2013)