Kevin Grant Solar1, Sarah Treit1, Emily Stolz1, and Christian Beaulieu1
1Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Synopsis
High
resolution diffusion tensor imaging reveals regional-specificity in
microstructural development of the healthy human hippocampus over 6-20 years. The
whole structure, head, body, and tail were visualized and segmented directly on
mean diffusion-weighted images. Whole-structure analyses showed age-related higher
FA and lower MD, and substructure analysis revealed that these associations were
strongest in the head – a finding corroborated by prior shape analyses showing
greater expansion in the hippocampal head during development. This
regional-specificity may reflect hippocampal neurogenesis and myelination in
coherence with the high concentration of connections that form at the head from
childhood into adulthood.
Introduction
The
hippocampus is a critical structure for learning and memory, but it is
difficult to image given its small size and complex internal architecture. Most
hippocampal studies in typical childhood/adolescent development focus on
whole/subfield volume or external shape analysis on 3D T1-weighted images1,2. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can provide complementary
measures on hippocampal microstructure, but very few studies have focused on
its development. The whole hippocampus has shown lower MD and higher FA with
age over 8-13 years in healthy children3. However, the accuracy of the diffusion parameters is
limited and subfield analysis is not possible since DTI is usually acquired
with very low spatial resolution (voxel sizes of > 2x2x2 = 8 mm3).
A recently published protocol enables the acquisition of high resolution (voxel
size = 1 mm3) DTI of the hippocampus in a reasonable 5.5 minutes at
3T that yields excellent visualization of internal structures and segments
while minimizing partial volume effects4. The purpose of this study was to use high resolution DTI to
evaluate age-related changes of the hippocampus head, body and tail in healthy children
to young adults.Methods
High
resolution 1 mm isotropic DTI was acquired in 40 healthy volunteers (6-20 years; 19 males) on a Siemens Prisma 3T using
a recently published method4: scan-time 5:18 minutes for 20 1 mm slices, no
gap, single shot 2D EPI (GRAPPA R2; 6/8 PPF; A/P phase encode), FOV 220 x 216
mm2, matrix 220 x 216, BW 1420 Hz/px, 1x1x1 mm3 with no
interpolation, TE 72 ms, TR 2800 ms, diffusion-time 29 ms, b 500 s/mm2
with 10 monopolar gradient directions and 10 averages, and 12 b 0 s/mm2,
aligned to the long axis of the hippocampus on 3D T1-weighted MPRAGE
(0.85x0.85x0.85 mm3). Processing included denoising, Gibbs-ringing, motion,
and distortion correction, and tensor parameter estimation (MRtrix3). Regions-of-interest
were traced manually on mean DWI axial slices using ITK-SNAP to yield left and
right whole-structure volume, FA and MD of the hippocampus. FA and MD were also measured in the head,
body and tail of the left hippocampus segmented manually on a single central mean
DWI slice (Figure 1)5. Paired t-tests revealed left/right differences
in whole-hippocampal volume but not diffusion, and unpaired t-tests demonstrated
no male/female differences. Therefore, age-related change was examined in
males/females together for whole volumes (left/right separated), whole FA or MD
(left/right averaged), and in the head, body, and tail for FA or MD (segmented
in the left only; right not analyzed yet). Linear, quadratic and exponential models
were assessed using Akaike information criterion (SPSS). Tests
with p < .05 were considered significant.Results
Major
hippocampal anatomy, including head digitations and the stratum lacunosum
moleculare, are well-delineated on mean DWI over the full age range of 6-20
years and visual analysis of the color-coded MD maps suggest age-related
diffusion changes (Figure 2). Right whole-hippocampal volumes of 2368 +/- 480
mm3 were greater than left of 2230 +/- 499 mm3 (t = 3.37,
p = .002) over the entire group, and linear fits showed a steeper positive slope
of whole hippocampal volume versus age in the left (Figure 3).
For
whole-hippocampal diffusion (left/right averaged), quadratic fits demonstrated
lower MD (Figure 4A) and higher FA (Figure 5A) with age from 6-20 years, albeit
by small amounts (-4% MD, +9% FA). However, these diffusion changes were not
constant across the entire structure. Quadratic relationships were identified
only in the head and tail with the steepest age-related MD reduction in the
head (Figure 4B) then the tail (Figure 4D), but no age-related MD change in the
body (Figure 4C). Similarly, the head had the only significant positive
correlation (quadratic) of FA with age (Figure 5B-D).Discussion and Conclusions
High resolution 1 mm
isotropic DTI revealed developmental changes in the healthy hippocampus over 6
to 20 years of age. The whole
structure findings replicated those found with low spatial resolution3, but it was shown here that age
associations varied regionally with the largest diffusion changes found in the
hippocampal head relative to the body and tail. This finding is corroborated by
a large sample anatomical MRI study which reported greater expansion with age
in the head over the first two decades of life1. Previous ex vivo work suggests that myelination and
neuron density increases occur throughout childhood and into adulthood with a
regional-specific pattern that may be related to higher rates of cell
maturation and connections in the head6,7. Overall, high resolution DTI enables the delineation
of hippocampal substructures and demonstrates regional specificity of microstructural
neurodevelopment in childhood and adolescence.Acknowledgements
Operating grant was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Author KS acknowledges a scholarship award from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship-Doctoral, CGS D).References
1. Lynch KM,
Shi Y, Toga AW, Clark KA. Hippocampal shape maturation in childhood and
adolescence. Cereb Cortex. 2018;[Epub ahead of print]:1-15.
2. Gogtay N,
Nugent TF, Herman DH, et al. Dynamic mapping of normal human hippocampal
development. Hippocampus. 2006;16(8):664-672.
3. Mah A,
Geeraert B, Lebel C. Detailing neuroanatomical development in late childhood
and early adolescence using NODDI. Leemans A, ed. PLoS One.
2017;12(8):e0182340.
4. Treit S,
Steve T, Gross DW, Beaulieu C. High resolution in-vivo diffusion imaging of the
human hippocampus. Neuroimage. 2018;182:479-487.
5. Wisse LEM,
Daugherty AM, Olsen RK, et al. A harmonized segmentation protocol for
hippocampal and parahippocampal subregions: why do we need one and what are the
key goals? Hippocampus. 2017;27(1):3-11.
6. Beaujoin J, Palomero-Gallagher N, Boumezbeur F, et al. Post-mortem inference of the
human hippocampal connectivity and microstructure using ultra-high field
diffusion MRI at 11.7 T. Brain Struct Funct. 2018;223:2157-2179.
7. Ábrahám H,
Vincze A, Jewgenow I, et al. Myelination in the human hippocampal formation
from midgestation to adulthood. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2010;28(5):401-410.