0949

Dephasing Optimization Through Coherence Order Pathway Selection (DOTCOPS): Validation and Inclusion of Phase Cycling
Karl Landheer1 and Christoph Juchem1,2

1Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States, 2Radiology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States

Synopsis

Modern magnetic resonance spectroscopic (MRS) pulse sequences frequently overlook the issue of unwanted coherence pathways as source of numerous spectral artifacts. A novel and robust algorithm which only requires the input of the desired coherence pathway was developed to efficiently dephase all unwanted coherence pathways for any MRS pulse sequence. Experiments were performed on phantoms and healthy volunteers comparing crusher schemes obtained from the literature with those obtained from the optimization algorithm for sLASER and MEGA-sLASER. The results demonstrate that the effects of unwanted coherences can be drastically reduced through the implementation of an optimized crusher and phase cycling scheme.

Introduction

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) pulse sequences use a combination of pulsed-field gradients and phase cycling to dephase unwanted coherence pathways (UCPs). The UCPs are incidentally perturbed by the RF pulses. The number of UCPs is largely increased for modern sequences such as LASER1, semi-LASER2 (sLASER) or MEGA-sLASER3 over traditional three-pulse experiments such as STEAM4 or PRESS5 and the challenge of designing an appropriate crusher and phase cycling scheme becomes difficult. Here we demonstrate the efficacy of a previously reported algorithm for optimizing crusher schemes, referred to as Dephasing Optimization Through COherence Pathway Selection (DOTCOPS)6, and expand upon the algorithm to include phase cycling, as it is standard for both to be used in tandem.

Methods

Phase cycling consists of averaging the measured signals from $$$N_p$$$ repetitions of an experiment where the phases of the RF pulses and receiver are varied in order for the desired pathways to constructively interfere and undesired pathways cancel. This can be done in two different ways. The first, referred to as nested schemes, consists of varying the phase of a single RF pulse from one repetition to the next, which is what is typically implemented in MRS. The second way is referred to as cogwheel phase cycling7, and consists of varying the phase of several of the RF pulses simultaneously from one cycle to another, which has not yet been implemented in in vivo MRS. Both methods dephase UCPs through the same mechanism and can be understood by considering coherence pathways. For a given coherence pathway, $$$\boldsymbol{\rho}$$$, the phase of the measured signal is given by7,8

$$ \Phi^{(m)}(\boldsymbol{ \rho }) = \sum_{i=1}^{N_{RF}}\phi_i^{(m)}\Delta\rho_i + \phi_{rec}^{(m)} ,$$

where $$$\Delta\rho_i$$$ indicates the change in coherence order induced by the ith RF pulse, $$$\phi_i^{m}$$$ is the phase of the ith RF pulse for cycle $$$m$$$, and $$$\phi_{rec}^{(m)}$$$ is the receiver phase for cycle $$$m$$$. Constructive interference is obtained when7,8

$$N_p^{-1}\sum_{m=1}^{N_{p}}exp[-\Phi^{(m)}(\boldsymbol{\rho})] = 1. $$

The optimal phase cycling scheme in the new DOTCOPS algorithm is obtained by determining all possible phase cycling schemes considering both nested and cogwheel schemes and selects the scheme which dephases the largest number of UCPs. The optimal crusher scheme is then obtained by using the original DOTCOPS algorithm6,9 but only considering coherence pathways which have not been dephased by phase cycling. The new DOTCOPS algorithm was run choosing an 8-step phase cycle for five MRS sequences, although it can handle any $$$N_p$$$.

DOTCOPS without phase cycling optimization was compared in phantoms and in vivo for the pulse sequences sLASER and MEGA-sLASER, with full experimental details available in a previous manuscript9. Crusher schemes from literature for sLASER and MEGA-sLASER were from Scheenen et al.10 and Andreychenko et al.3, respectively. For the MEGA-sLASER experiments the residual water signal, which originates from UCPs, was quantified by integrating the magnitude signal from 4.4 to 5.0 ppm and normalizing relative to the water signal from the literature scheme.

Results and Discussion

The inclusion of an optimized 8-step phase cycling scheme can reduce the effective crushing strength for a 9-pulse experiment by approximately a factor of two, as the minimum crushing strength with DOTCOPS without phase cycling9 was 1.00, whereas with phase cycling it is 1.97 (Table 1). It was found that cogwheel phase cycling outperformed nested phase cycling for all sequences.

There is substantial baseline distortion in phantom experiments with the literature crusher scheme for sLASER which can be eliminated through the use of the DOTCOPS crusher scheme (Figure 1), whereas for MEGA-sLASER there is severe water contamination and spurious echoes which can also be rectified with DOTCOPS (Figure 2). In vivo spectra from sLASER contain UCPs which are so severe they completely obscure the spectra, which are virtually eliminated with DOTCOPS to produce high-quality spectra (Figure 3). Similarly, the measured in vivo spectra for MEGA-sLASER with the literature crusher scheme shows strong spurious echo signals and uncrushed residual water, whereas the DOTCOPS scheme can greatly reduce the spurious echoes and uncrushed water without changing the gradient durations (Figure 4). Furthermore, the DOTCOPS scheme which uses crusher durations matched to the inter-pulse delays further reduces the uncrushed water signal (Figure 4). The quantified residual water showed a decrease of 56% to 99% and 81% to 99% for DOTCOPS and DOTCOPS elongated crusher schemes over the literature scheme, respectively.

Conclusion

Highly effective crusher schemes can be developed using DOTCOPS, and this was demonstrated experimentally in both phantoms and healthy volunteers. The DOTCOPS algorithm was expanded to include phase cycling and optimized crusher and phase cycling schemes were presented for five modern MRS sequences.

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the New York State Psychiatric Institute (NYSPI) and Dr. Feng Liu for their facilities and technical support. This research was supported by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (NMSS, RG-5319).

References

  1. Garwood, M. & DelaBarre, L. The Return of the Frequency Sweep: Designing Adiabatic Pulses for Contemporary NMR. Jour Magn Reson 153, 155–177 (2001).
  2. Scheenen, T. W., Heerschap, A. & Klomp, D. W. Towards 1H-MRSI of the human brain at 7T with slice-selective adiabatic refocusing pulses. Magn Reson Mater Phy 21, 95–101 (2008).
  3. Andreychenko, A., Boer, V. O., Arteaga de Castro, C. S., Luijten, P. R. & Klomp, D. W. J. Efficient Spectral Editing at 7 T: GABA Detection with MEGA-sLASER. Magn Reson Med 68, 1018–1025 (2012).
  4. Haase, A., Frahm, J., Matthaei, D., Hanicke, W., Bomsdorf, H., Dietmar, K., Tischler, R. MR imaging using stimulated echoes (STEAM). Radiology 160, 787–790 (1986).
  5. Bottomley, P. A. Spatial Localization in NMR Spectroscopy in Vivo. Ann N Y Acad Sci 508, 333–348 (1987).
  6. Landheer, K. & Juchem, C. Optimized Crusher Design for Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. 2017 Proc ISMRM Program Number 1288.
  7. Levitt, M. H., Madhu, P. K. & Hughes, C. E. Cogwheel phase cycling. Jour Magn Reson 155, 300–306 (2002).
  8. Malom H. Levitt. Spin Dynamics. (Wiley, 2008).
  9. Landheer, K. & Juchem, C. Dephasing Optimization Through Coherence Order Pathway Selection (DOTCOPS) for Improved Crusher Schemes in Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med [Epub ahead of print] (2018).
  10. Scheenen, T. W. J., Klomp, D. W. J., Wijnen, J. P. & Heerschap, A. Short echo time 1H-MRSI of the human brain at 3T with minimal chemical shift displacement errors using adiabatic refocusing pulses. Magn Reson Med 59, 1–6 (2008).

Figures

Table 1: List of relative crusher areas and minimum crushing strength of the UCPs obtained from DOTCOPS for 5 common in vivo MRS pulse sequences with an 8-step phase cycling scheme for an uncoupled spin. For all optimizations it was found that cogwheel phase cycling crushed a larger number of UCPs than nested phase cycling. The notation used to describe the phase cycling scheme is that from the original cogwheel manuscript7.

Figure 1: sLASER spectra from standard GE "BRAINO" metabolite phantom with TE = 40 ms using a crusher scheme obtained from a) Scheenen et al.10 and b) the DOTCOPS scheme. As can be seen the spurious echoes substantially distort the baseline and quality of the spectra, which can be drastically reduced by modifying the crusher scheme without changing the individual crusher duration or maximum amplitude.

Figure 2: MEGA-sLASER spectra from standard GE "BRAINO" metabolite phantom with TE = 72 ms, editing frequency on water, using a crusher scheme obtained from a) Andreychenko et al.3, b) the identical spectrum at zoomed amplitude range, c) the novel crusher scheme with equal duration of crushers as a/b) and d) the novel crusher scheme using gradient durations matched to the time between RF pulses. The uncrushed water signal and spurious echoes are substantially reduced by only modifying the crusher scheme, c), and can be virtually eliminated by elongating some of the crushers to fill the inter-RF pulse delay times, d).

Figure 3: Spectra obtained using sLASER with two different crusher schemes in healthy volunteers. The first row uses a scheme obtained from Scheenen et al.10, the second row is from DOTCOPS. In the first row the spurious echoes are so severe as to completely obscure the spectra whereas, in the second row, with only a modification of the crushing scheme high spectral quality was obtained. The spectra from the first subject was obtained with a crusher amplitude of 30 mT/m, and 24 mT/m for all other subjects.

Figure 4: Spectra obtained using MEGA-sLASER. The first 2 rows are spectra from six different voxels with a crusher scheme obtained from Andreychenko et al.3, at full amplitude range and a range consistent with the following conditions, respectively. The third row is spectra obtained with DOTCOPS, and the fourth row with DOTCOPS which took as inputs the inter-RF pulse delays and set the crushers to be equal to those durations. The editing pulse was placed on water and acted as MEGA water suppression, thus any residual water is due to imperfect crushing and a measure for the UCP suppression efficiency.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 27 (2019)
0949