0926

3D Bloch-Siegert EPI B1+-mapping
Andreas Lesch1, Christoph Stefan Aigner1, Stefan Manfred Spann1, Matthias Schloegl1, and Rudolf Stollberger1,2

1Institute of Medical Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria, 2BioTechMed Graz, Graz, Austria

Synopsis

In this work we investigate the feasibility of a double shot acquisition for 3D Bloch-Siegert B1+ mapping. Therefore, we combine the previously proposed variational reconstruction algorithm for highly subsampled Bloch-Siegert data with an EPI readout. The acquired dataset was retrospectively under-sampled and the reconstruction results are compared to the fully sampled reference, a zero padded low resolution estimate and to results acquired with a much more robust GRE readout. We can show that the results are in good accordance to the fully sampled reference and the GRE acquisition for acceleration factors of up to 100 making double shot acquisition possible.

Introduction

Fast and accurate quantification of the $$$B_{1}^+$$$-field and the resulting flip angle is a crucial calibration step at high and ultra-high field strength for various applications in MRI. A very promising approach to map the $$$B_{1}^+$$$-field is based on the Bloch-Siegert shift caused by an off-resonant RF-pulse1 that allows usage of short repetition times (TR). However, the Bloch-Siegert method is limited by high RF-energy deposition and therefore restricts the minimal possible TR due to patient safety constraints. In the case of 3D acquisition, the SAR limitations lead to unacceptable long acquisition times. To overcome this limitation fast acquisition strategies like EPI2,3 or spiral3,4 readouts were proposed on the one hand and on the other hand compressed sensing (CS) based reconstruction algorithms for under-sampled data5,6. This work combines a previous developed CS reconstruction framework with fast under-sampled EPI acquistion to acquire 3D volumes with a double shot measurement for ultrafast 3D volume $$$B_{1}^+$$$-mapping below 1s.

Methods

A 3D-EPI-SE sequence with segmented acquisition in slice encoding direction with an echo train length of 128 was implemented using the open source sequence development tool Pulseq7. Figure 1 depicts the main sequence elements and their timing. We used a slice selective excitation pulse with an flip angle of 25° and a non-selective rectangular refocusing pulse together with symmetric crusher gradients. An off-resonant Bloch-Siegert pulse with a duration $$$T_{BS}=8ms$$$, a resonance offset $$$\Delta\omega_{BS}=4kHz$$$ and an on-resonant equivalent flip angle $$$\alpha_{BS}=1000°$$$ leading to a pulse constant $$$K_{BS}=35.7rad/G^2$$$ was inserted between the excitation and refocusing pulse. With this sequence we acquired a 3D-dataset of a cylindrical water phantom on a 3T MR system (Skyra, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The following imaging parameters were used, leading to a total acquisition time of $$$T_{aq}=22s$$$: $$$FOV=250mm$$$, matrix size $$$128\times 128\times 32$$$, 37.5% slice oversampling, readout bandwidth of 2041Hz/pixel, $$$TR/TE=250/105ms$$$ and a resolution of 5mm in slice direction.

The variational reconstruction algorithm for subsampled Bloch-Siegert measurements is described in6 and consists of a two-step procedure. Both steps are defined by solving an optimization problem. In the first step a TGV-regularization term8,9, which enforces piecewise smooth solutions, is applied to reconstruct the magnitude and phase of the underlying image. In the second step a smoothness constraint is applied to stabilize the spatial smoothness of the underlying $$$B_{1+}$$$-field defined as follows (for further details we refer to6):

$$\hat{u}=\arg\min_u\frac{\lambda}{2}\parallel\,k_+-\mathcal{F}\left(u\right)\,\parallel_2^2+TGV\left(u\right)$$

$$\hat{v}=\arg\min_v\frac{\mu}{2}\parallel\,k_--\mathcal{F}\left(\hat{u}\,\cdot\,v\right)\,\parallel_2^2+\parallel\nabla\,v\parallel_2^2=e^{-j2\phi_{BS}}$$

The regularization parameters $$$\lambda$$$ and $$$\mu$$$ where chosen as follows: $$$\lambda=64$$$ and $$$\mu=15\cdot 10^{-4}$$$.

To investigate the potential of the proposed method for a two shot acquisition, the fully sampled dataset was retrospectively under-sampled using block sampling patterns of different sizes, summarized in Table 1. For the evaluation the mean absolute error (MAE) compared to the fully sampled reference, its median (medAE) and its 99% ($$$q_{99\%}$$$) quantile were used. Additionally a fully sampled Bloch-Siegert 3D-dataset with a GRE based sequence was acquired for reference purposes ($$$T_{aq}=15min$$$).

Results

In Figure 2 a comparison between EPI and GRE acquisition is shown, where only very small deviations can be observed. Figure 3 shows the results gained with our two-step reconstruction method from under-sampled 3D-EPI-SE data compared to a zero padded low resolution estimate. The dedicated reconstruction method lead generally to lower errors in comparison to the full sampled reference measurement. Even for the very small kernel size of 6x4 encodings, good results could be achieved with the EPI acquisition for the phantom. The lager k-space block with 10x4 and 12x6 should certainly work in vivo and can be typically implemented as a single shot. A summary of all investigated under-sampling patterns is given in Table 1 showing a reduction of all error measures.

Discussion and Conclusion

With the proposed strategy we could show that similar acceleration factors are achievable with EPI as stated in6 where a much more stable GRE readout was used. In the performed measurement we used an echo train length for the EPI readout of 128, which means that even for the large block pattern size of 14x8 encodings in k-space center the echo train length would be shorter, showing the feasibility that the goal of a two shot acquisition (two different BS-Pulses) of the whole 3D-volume is more than feasible. The challenge for the EPI based measurement consists in the influence of B0-inhomgenities and chemical shift effects. But in all situation where other EPI based measurements are possible (diffusion, perfusion) the 3D EPI based B1 mapping should also be applicable. With only two Bloch-Siegert-pulses the SAR is reduced to a minimal fraction.

Acknowledgements

This work is partially funded and supported by the AustrianScience Fund (FWF) in the context of project “SFB F32‐N18”

References

1 Sacolick LI, Wiesinger F, Hancu I, Vogel MW. B1 mapping by Bloch–Siegert shift. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63:1315–1322.

2 Duan Q, Souheil IJ, van Gelderen P, Sunil P, Jeff DH. Implementation and validation of fast whole‐brain B1 mapping based on Bloch–Siegert shift and EPI readout. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Melbourne, Australia, 2012; p. 609.

3 Saranathan M, Khalighi MM, Glover GH, Pandit P, Rutt BK. Efficient Bloch–Siegert B1(+) mapping using spiral and echoplanar readouts. Magn Reson Med. 2013;70:1669–1673.

4 Khalighi M, Glover G, Pandit P, et al. Single‐shot spiral based Bloch–Siegert B1+ mapping. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2011; p. 578.

5 Sharma A, Tadanki S, Jankiewicz M, Grissom WA. Highlyaccelerated Bloch–Siegert ­B1+ ­ mapping using joint autocalibrated parallel image reconstruction. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71:1470–1477.

6 Lesch A, Schloegl M, Holler M, Bredies K, Stollberger R. Ultrafast 3D Bloch–Siegert B‐mapping using variational modeling. Magn Reson Med. 2018; DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27434

7 Layton KJ, Kroboth S, Jia F, Littin S, Yu H, Leupold J, Nielsen JF, Stöcker T, Zaitsev M. Pulseq: A rapid and hardware‐independent pulse sequence prototyping framework. Magn Reson Med. 2017;77(4), 1544-1552.

8 Bredies K, Kunisch K, Pock T. Total generalized variation. SIAM J Imaging Sci. 2010;3:492–526.

9 Knoll F, Bredies K, Pock T, Stollberger R. Second order total generalized variation (TGV) for MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2011;65:480–491.

Figures

Figure 1: Sequence Diagram for the Bloch-Siegert EPI-SE sequence. Three reference lines are acquired after excitation for N/2 EPI-ghost correction followed by the off-resonant Bloch-Siegert pulse. After the 2nd crusher gradient of the non-selective refocusing the EPI-readout starts.

Figure 2: One representative B1+-map in µT from fully sampled data acquired with GRE and EPI. The normalized differece map between the GRE and EPI acquisition on the right side shows the good accordance between this two approaches.

Figure 3: B1+-map in µT for fully sampled reference, zero padded low resolution estimate and the result of the two-step reconstruction algorithm for a retrospectively subsampled dataset in a cylindrical water phantom for block sizes of 6x4, 10x4 and 12x6 encoding in k-space center. One representative slice of a 3D-dataset is shown. The right part of each column shows the error map for the corresponding result as normalzed error in percent of the desired B1 magnitude. The MAE is given as the mean of the error map over a certain ROI inside the cylinder.

Table 1: MAE, medAE and q99% inside a certain ROI for different block sizes in percent of the desired B1 magnitude and the corresponding acceleration factor R. The values are given for the zero padded low resolution estimate and the results of the two-step reconstruction algorithm.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 27 (2019)
0926