Changho Choi1, Vivek Tiwari1, Zhongxu An1, Sandeep Ganji2, Michael Levy1, Edward Pan1, Elizabeth Maher1, Toral Patel1, and Bruce Mickey1
1UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 2Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA, United States
Synopsis
MRS of 2-hydroxyglutarate
(2HG) has the great potential for determining the isocitrate
dehydrogenase (IDH) mutational status in brain tumors noninvasively. This clinical
role of 2HG MRS may be demonstrated most clearly in patients with brainstem gliomas or deep brain lesions, where surgical biopsy presents significant risk
of permanent neurological deficit. We report 2HG MRS data in patients with brainstem
tumors. 2HG was evaluated, using a 2HG-optimized TE 97ms PRESS at 3T, in 12
subjects with brainstem lesions in vivo.
We also presents data of monitoring the tumor with serial 2HG MRS scans.
INTRODUCTION
MRS identification of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) in isocitrate
dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas is a major
breakthrough in neuro-oncology imaging. It is the first imaging biomarker specific
to a genetic mutation in gliomas, making the diagnosis of IDH mutant gliomas
possible without biopsy. 2HG also has significant predictive value with respect
to the stage and survival in gliomas because an IDH mutation carries a
favorable prognosis 1. Importantly,
the IDH mutational status was defined as centrally important in the 2016 WHO classification
of gliomas 2. Thus, 2HG MRS
can provide a noninvasive tool for determining diagnosis in gliomas and is
increasingly implemented in clinical MR scanners. Detection of 2HG is of particular importance for patients with
brainstem gliomas or deep brain lesions where surgical biopsy is challenging and presents significant risk of
permanent neurological deficit.METHODS
Twelve subjects with a
radiographically identified lesion in the brainstem were enrolled prior to
radio-chemotherapy (5 male and 7 female, age 20 - 74, median age 39). Proton MRS data were acquired from the lesions using PRESS in a Philips
Achieva 3T MR scanner. Water suppressed spectra were acquired using TE 97ms
PRESS (TE1=32 ms and TE2=65 ms). The voxel size was 1.2 - 8 mL, depending on
the tumor volume identified by T2-FLAIR. Data acquisition parameters included TR
2s, number of averages 128 - 1024, sweep width 2500 Hz, and number of samples 2048.
Unsuppressed water was acquired from each voxel using STEAM (TE 14ms; TR 20s). LCModel
spectral fitting was performed using basis spectra that were numerically calculated incorporating the volume
localizing RF and gradient pulses of the PRESS sequence 3. The metabolite concentrations were estimated with
reference to water at 45M.RESULTS and DISCUSSION
Figure 1
presents an MRS result from a subject with a brainstem lesion. Two peaks were
identified between 2.2 and 2.4 ppm, which were attributed to 2HG and glutamate
(Glu). 2HG and Glu were estimated to be 5.3 and 3.2 mM with precision (CRLB 4%
and 5% respectively). This detection of 2HG and non-enhancement in post-contrast
MRI suggested that the lesion was an IDH-mutant low-grade glioma. The decision
was made to follow the patient with serial 2HG MRS without surgical and radio-chemotherapeutic
treatments until there is clear evidence of tumor progression. The patient had
2HG MRS at 19 time points over a 4.4 year period, during which the 2HG estimation
remained about the same (i.e., within approximately +/- 1 mM relative to the baseline 2HG level) and
the tumor was clinically stable. Figure
2 shows data from a patient, who had MRS scans at two time points. The 2HG
estimation of the first MRS was closely reproduced in the second scan (6.3 vs.
6.1 mM). Other metabolite levels were also similar between the scans. Figure 3 presents a case of
heterogeneous 2HG levels in a brainstem tumor. The 2HG signal strength was clearly
different between the spectra from two locations, resulting in 2HG estimates of
4.8 and 1.1 mM. Other metabolites showed relatively small differences between
the locations. Figure 4 presents a
2HG negative case. In a data from a brainstem tumor patient, a signal was not
discernible at 2.25 ppm, with a large broad signal center at 2.4 ppm. Spectral
fitting indicated null 2HG together with elevated succinate (1.3mM) and decreased
Glu (3.5mM). The data showed elevated glycine (2.3mM), which is indicative of
rapid cell proliferation 4. This
MRS interpretation agreed with enhancement in post-contrast MRI. The tumor was radiographically
diagnosed as an IDH wildtype glioblastoma and the patient underwent radio-chemotherapy. The
2HG estimates from all 12 subjects of the present study are presented in Figure 5. The signal-to-noise ratio was
not substantially different between data, with the use of scan times adjusted
according to the voxel size. The 2HG estimation ranged from 0 to 6.3 mM (CRLB 5%
- 999%). Five cases with 2HG levels higher than 1 mM (patients 8 - 12) were interpreted
as IDH mutation, while seven cases with less than 1 mM 2HG level were considered
as IDH wildtype or inconclusive, using a detection threshold suggested in a
prior study 5.CONCLUSION
This study demonstrates the
clinical utility of 2HG MRS in patients with brainstem tumors, from which biopsy
is often unavailable. 2HG MRS in brainstem tumors may be technically challenging
compared to intracranial tumors. The 2HG-optimized MRS method, used in the
present study, may provide reliable assessment of 2HG in brainstem lesions and
can be effectively used for evaluating the IDH mutational status of the lesion.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Cancer
Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers R01CA154843
and R01CA184584 and by the Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas under
an award number RP130427. We thank Ms. Kelley
Derner and Lucy Christie for subject recruitment and Dr. Ivan Dimitrov for
technical assistance.References
1. Yan
H, Parsons DW, Jin G, et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. New Engl J Med.
2009;360:765-73.
2. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta neuropathologica. 2016;131:803-20.
3. Choi C, Ganji S, Hulsey K, et al. A comparative study of short- and long-TE 1H MRS at 3 T for in vivo detection of 2-hydroxyglutarate in brain tumors. NMR Biomed. 2013;26:1242-50.
4. Jain M, Nilsson R, Sharma S, et al. Metabolite profiling identifies a key role for glycine in rapid cancer cell
proliferation. Science.
2012;336:1040-4.
5. Choi
C, Raisanen JM, Ganji SK, et al. Prospective longitudinal analysis of 2-hydroxyglutarate magnetic resonance spectroscopy identifies broad clinical utility for the management of patients with IDH-mutant glioma. J Clin
Oncol. 2016;34:4030-4039.