Current solutions for T1 mapping rely on 2D images of the heart, and require time-inefficient cardiac gating as well as long breath-holds. To address these drawbacks, a Free-running framework for fully self-gated cardiac and respiratory motion-resolved 5D imaging of the heart was extended to include T1 recovery contrast as a 6th dimension. The framework was tested at 3T in an ISMRM-NIST phantom and demonstrated good agreement between the estimated T1 values and reference standard. Preliminary 3D T1 maps in 3 healthy volunteers showed good resolution of the physiological motion and accurate T1 values of the myocardium and blood.
Acquisition: A prototype Free-running 3D radial sequence with a Phyllotaxis trajectory5,6 was modified to acquire gradient-recalled echoes (GRE) and to play out a 180° pulse every 880 readouts. This sequence continuously acquired data independently of the cardiac and respiratory cycles. The trajectory was subdivided into segments of 22 readouts each. Consecutive segments were rotated by the golden angle, and each started with a readout oriented along the superior-inferior (SI) direction for physiological motion signal extraction. Acquisitions were performed on a clinical 3T scanner (MAGNETOM Prismafit, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with the following parameters: matrix (112)3, isotropic spatial resolution (1.96mm)3, TE/TR=1.48/3.41ms, flip angle (FA)=5°, inversion pulse every 3s, 261140 total readouts acquired over 17min.
Map reconstruction and phantom calibration: The sequence was first tested on an ISMRM-NIST quantitative MRI phantom7 with 14 spheres with different T1 values. The inversion time (TI) was used to bin the data with 4 different temporal resolutions (75, 150, 225, 300ms) to assess the effect of the bin width on the T1 estimation. 4D gridding reconstructions (x-y-z-TI) were performed, with 40, 20, 13, and 10 bins equally spaced along the magnetization recovery dimension. A pixel-by-pixel 3-parameter fit of the signal S was performed as: $$y\left(t\right)=a\left[1-be^{-\frac{t}{T_1^*}}\right]$$ to extract T1* values. T1 was estimated from T1* by correcting for the GRE pulse train:8 $$T_{1}=\left[\frac{1}{T_1^*}+\frac{\log\left(\cos\left(FA\right)\right)}{TR}\right]^{-1}$$ The coefficient of determination R2 of the fit was retained to discard unreliable T1 values estimations. The true FA in Eq.2 was determined once by matching the T1 values from regions of interest (ROIs) inside the 14 spheres to the reference values.
In vivo study and physiological signal extraction: The framework was applied in 3 healthy volunteers who provided written informed consent; the study was IRB approved. A fully self-gated motion extraction framework9 was adapted to correct for the changing contrast: SI readouts were Fourier transformed and filtered to remove signal amplitude oscillations. Principal component analysis (PCA) was then performed on the SI projections,10 and two components corresponding to respiratory and cardiac motion were selected. Physiological signals were used to bin the data into 3 respiratory states and into 10-12 cardiac bins with a temporal resolution of 100ms. The reconstruction of motion-and-contrast-resolved 6D images (x-y-z-cardiac-respiratory-TI) was performed using a k-t sparse SENSE algorithm.4 To improve SNR, respiratory motion states were registered to end-expiration and averaged together, after which T1 maps were generated for a cardiac bin in the diastolic resting phase. Mean and standard deviation of T1 values were estimated from ROIs in the blood pool and myocardium.
1. Messroghli DR, Moon JC, Ferreira VM, Grosse-Wortmann L, He T, Kellman P, Mascherbauer J, Nezafat R, Salerno M, Schelbert EB, Taylor AJ, Thompson R, Ugander M, van Heeswijk RB, Friedrich MG. Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: A consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2017;19(1):75.
2. Messroghli DR, Radjenovic A, Kozerke S, Higgins DM, Sivananthan MU, Ridgway JP. Modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high-resolution T1 mapping of the heart. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2004;52(1):141-146.
3. Chow K, Flewitt JA, Green JD, Pagano JJ, Friedrich MG, Thompson RB. Saturation recovery single-shot acquisition (SASHA) for myocardial T(1) mapping. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2014;71(6):2082-2095.
4. Feng L, Coppo S, Piccini D, Yerly J, Lim RP, Masci PG, Stuber M, Sodickson DK, Otazo R. 5D whole-heart sparse MRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2017.
5. Coppo S, Piccini D, Bonanno G, Chaptinel J, Vincenti G, Feliciano H, van Heeswijk RB, Schwitter J, Stuber M. Free-running 4D whole-heart self-navigated golden angle MRI: Initial results. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2015;74(5):1306-1316.
6. Piccini D, Littmann A, Nielles-Vallespin S, Zenge MO. Spiral phyllotaxis: the natural way to construct a 3D radial trajectory in MRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2011;66(4):1049-1056.
7. Keenan, K.E., et al. “Comparison of T1 measurements using ISMRM/NIST system phantom”. Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Singapore, 2016.
8. Wang X, Roeloffs V, Klosowski J, Tan Z, Voit D, Uecker M, Frahm J. Model-based T1 mapping with sparsity constraints using single-shot inversion-recovery radial FLASH. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2018;79(2):730-740.
9. L. Di Sopra, D. Piccini, S. Coppo, J. A.M. Bastiaansen, M. Stuber, and J. Yerly, “Motion-resolved 5d imaging of the heart: time to get rid of the ECG?,” in Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2017, 3148
10. Pang J, Sharif B, Fan Z, Bi X, Arsanjani R, Berman DS, Li D. ECG and navigator-free four-dimensional whole-heart coronary MRA for simultaneous visualization of cardiac anatomy and function. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2014;72(5):1208-1217.
11. Weingartner S, Messner NM, Budjan J, Lossnitzer D, Mattler U, Papavassiliu T, Zollner FG, Schad LR. Myocardial T1-mapping at 3T using saturation-recovery: reference values, precision and comparison with MOLLI. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2016;18(1):84.