0650

Exploring the effect of varying axonal shape on the transverse diffusion inside EM-reconstructed axons using 3d Monte Carlo simulations
Hong Hsi Lee1,2, Els Fieremans1,2, and Dmitry S Novikov1,2

1Center for Biomedical Imaging, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 2Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States

Synopsis

Diffusion inside axons is restricted and thus non-Gaussian, with diffusion MRI (dMRI) signal strongly sensitive to the shape of the confining axon. This sensitivity is confounded by the coarse-graining of the diameter/shape variation along the fiber during the diffusion time. Here, we analytically relate dMRI metrics to the axonal shape, and validate our theory using 3d Monte-Carlo simulations in beaded cylinders and realistic axons reconstructed from electron microscopy images of the mouse brain white matter. Our simulation results show that the intra-axonal space has a non-trivial kurtosis transverse to axons. Its value is different from that in a perfectly straight cylinder, and needs to be considered in axonal diameter measurements (e.g., spinal cord, strong gradients, intra-axonal metabolites).

Purpose

We study the interplay in the intra-axonal signal between diffusion diffraction due to confinement in the transverse direction, and almost free diffusion in the longitudinal direction. We show that coarse-graining of transverse axonal cross-sections due to the longitudinal motion results in a non-Gaussian transverse signal, whose cumulants acquire sensitivity to axonal diameter variations, such as beading[1-6]. We validate our results using 3d Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations in (1) artificially designed cylinders with periodic beads, and in (2) realistic microstructure of intra-axonal space (IAS) segmented from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the mouse brain corpus callosum (CC)[7]. In particular, IAS signal is shown to have a non-negligible kurtosis transverse to axons. Its value is different from that of the prefect cylinder and needs to be considered in axonal diameter measurements using diffusion MRI (dMRI), e.g.,for large axons in spinal cord[8-10], with strong diffusion gradients applied[9,11], and for intra-axonal metabolites[12].

Methods

$$$\rm\bf{Theory}$$$

Our starting point is the diffusion-diffraction long-time limit of the propagator for a 2d confined pore[13,14],

$$G(q_\perp,t\to\infty)\simeq|V(q_\perp)|^2\,,\qquad(1)$$

where $$$V(q_\perp)$$$ is the Fourier transform of the pore shape. When the diffusion can occur in the 3rd dimension, this equation must be modified:

$$G(q_\perp,t\to\infty)\simeq|\langle{V(q_\perp)}\rangle|^2\,,\qquad(2)$$

where $$$\langle…\rangle$$$ is the coherent averaging over cross-sections within a coarse-graining window $$$L(t)\sim\sqrt{D_\parallel t}$$$ along the axon.

For a cylinder of varying radius, Fig.1, the result of this average is

$$\langle{V(q_\perp)}\rangle=1-\tfrac{1}{8}q_\perp^2\langle{r^2}\rangle_{\rm{v}}+\tfrac{1}{192}q_\perp^4\langle{r^4}\rangle_{\rm{v}}+…\,,\qquad(3)$$

where $$$V(q_\perp)$$$ is the Fourier transform of disc shape, and $$$\langle\cdot\rangle_{\rm{v}}$$$ denotes volume-weighted quantity for the disc volume $$$\propto{r^2}$$$. In Eq.(3), $$$V(q_\perp)$$$ is averaged first along the fiber, before calculating the propagator. This coherent averaging/coarse-graining effect within a fiber should be followed by the incoherent averaging over an ensemble of non-communicating fibers with different shapes.

Eqs.(2-3) yield for the radial diffusivity

$$ D_\perp(t)={r_{\rm eff}^2}/4t\,,\quad r_{\rm{eff}}^2\equiv\langle{r^4}\rangle/\langle{r^2}\rangle\,,\quad\quad(4)$$

generalizing the concept of effective radius $$$r_{\rm eff}$$$[15,16] onto variable axon shape.

For the radial kurtosis (RK) in the $$$t\to\infty$$$ limit, we obtain

$$K_\infty=\frac{\langle{r^4}\rangle_{\rm{v}}}{\langle{r^2}\rangle_{\rm{v}}^2}-\frac{3}{2}=\frac{\langle{r^6}\rangle\langle{r^2}\rangle}{\langle{r^4}\rangle^2}-\frac{3}{2}\,.\quad\quad(5)$$

$$$\rm\bf{Cylinders\,with\,periodic\,beads}$$$

To test the applicability of Eqs.(4,5), we designed cylinders with periodic beads, resulted by the radius variation along the z-axis,

$$r_b(z)=r_0+r_1\cos\left(\tfrac{2\pi{z}}{a}\right)\,,$$

where $$$a$$$ is the distance between beads, and $$$r_0$$$ and $$$r_1$$$ are parameters to tune the mean cross-section-area, $$$V/L$$$, and coefficient of variation of radii, CV($$$r$$$)$$$\,\equiv\frac{\sigma_r}{\bar{r}}$$$:

$$\tfrac{V}{L}=r_0^2+\tfrac{1}{2}r_1^2\,,\quad\quad{\rm{CV}}(r_b)=\frac{r_1}{\sqrt{2}r_0}\,.$$

Based on histological observations in the previous study[7], we fixed $$$a=5.4\,$$$µm and $$$V/L=\pi$$$×(1µm)$$$^2$$$, and varied CV($$$r$$$) from 0 (no beads) to 0.5 (big beads, Fig.1).

$$$\rm\bf{Realistic\,microstructure}$$$

The brain tissue from a female 8-week-old C57BL/6 mouse’s genu of CC was processed and analyzed with an SEM (Zeiss Gemini 300), in a volume of 36×48×20μm$$$^3$$$. We employed a simplified seeded-region-growing algorithm[7,17] to segment IAS, leading to 227 long axons (≥20μm in length). The IAS mask was down-sampled into a resolution of (0.1μm)$$$^3$$$ and aligned to the z-axis, as in Fig.2.

$$$\rm\bf{Numerical\,simulation}$$$

MC simulations of random walkers were implemented in MATLAB in continuous space within the 3d micro-geometry. For simulations in cylinders with periodic beads, 1×10$$$^5$$$ random walkers per cylinder diffuse over 2.5×10$$$^5$$$ steps with a duration 2×10$$$^{-4}$$$ms and a length 0.049µm. For simulations in realistic IAS, 1.2×10$$$^7$$$ random walkers in total diffuse over 5×10$$$^5$$$ steps with a duration 2×10$$$^{-4}$$$ms and a length 0.049µm. Intrinsic diffusivity $$$D_0$$$=2µm$$$^2$$$/ms. Total calculation time ~4.5days on 200 CPU cores at the NYU high-performance-computing cluster.

Diffusivity and kurtosis were estimated based on cumulants ($$$\langle{x^2}\rangle$$$,$$$\langle{x^4}\rangle$$$).

Results

For simulations in cylinders with periodic beads, simulated time-dependent RD, $$$D_\perp(t)$$$ in Fig.3a, scales as $$$1/t$$$ as discussed in Theory, and simulated RK, $$$K_\perp(t)$$$ in Fig.3b, is constant over diffusion times>5ms. The effective radius $$$r_{\rm{eff}}$$$ fitted based on simulations in Fig.3a is consistent with the theoretical predictions given by Eq.(4), as shown in Fig.3c. Similarly, RK in $$$t\to\infty$$$ limit, $$$K_\infty$$$, estimated based on simulations in Fig.3b agrees with the theoretical predictions given by Eq.(5), as shown in Fig.3d. In Fig.3e-f, $$$r_{\rm{eff}}$$$ and $$$K_\infty$$$ grows with the strength of beading, CV($$$r$$$), except for $$$K_\infty$$$ when CV($$$r$$$)>0.4.

For simulations in realistic IAS, simulated RD, $$$D_\perp(t)$$$ in Fig.4a, scales as $$$1/t$$$, and simulated RK, $$$K_\perp(t)$$$ in Fig.4b, gradually approaches to a constant at long times. However, the effective radius $$$r_{\rm{eff}}$$$ fitted based on simulations in Fig.4a is slightly larger than the theoretical predictions in Eq.(4), as shown in Fig.4c, probably due to the fiber undulations[18]. The RK in $$$t\to\infty$$$ limit, $$$K_\infty$$$, is centered around -0.2 (Fig.4d), different from the case of the perfect cylinder = -0.5.

Discussion and Conclusions

Numerical$$$\,$$$simulations$$$\,$$$in$$$\,$$$3d$$$\,$$$micro-geometries$$$\,$$$show$$$\,$$$that$$$\,$$$axons$$$\,$$$with$$$\,$$$the$$$\,$$$same$$$\,$$$mean$$$\,$$$radius $$$\langle{r}\rangle$$$ can$$$\,$$$actually$$$\,$$$have$$$\,$$$very$$$\,$$$different$$$\,$$$effective$$$\,$$$radius$$$\,$$$measured$$$\,$$$by$$$\,$$$dMRI,$$$\,$$$depending$$$\,$$$on$$$\,$$$the$$$\,$$$strength$$$\,$$$of$$$\,$$$the$$$\,$$$caliber$$$\,$$$variation$$$\,$$$or$$$\,$$$beading, CV($$$r$$$). Furthermore,$$$\,$$$the$$$\,$$$RK$$$\,$$$contributed$$$\,$$$by$$$\,$$$IAS$$$\,$$$is$$$\,$$$non-negligible ~ -0.2 (c.f. -0.5 for$$$\,$$$a$$$\,$$$perfect$$$\,$$$cylinder), $$$\,$$$and$$$\,$$$needs$$$\,$$$to$$$\,$$$be$$$\,$$$included$$$\,$$$in$$$\,$$$model[8-12]$$$\,$$$when$$$\,$$$estimating$$$\,$$$axonal$$$\,$$$diameter$$$\,$$$using$$$\,$$$dMRI,$$$\,$$$especially$$$\,$$$for$$$\,$$$large$$$\,$$$axons$$$\,$$$ (e.g.,spinal$$$\,$$$cord),$$$\,$$$with$$$\,$$$strong$$$\,$$$gradients$$$\,$$$applied,$$$\,$$$and$$$\,$$$for$$$\,$$$modeling$$$\,$$$diffusion$$$\,$$$of$$$\,$$$metabolites$$$\,$$$specific$$$\,$$$to$$$\,$$$the$$$\,$$$IAS.$$$\,$$$We$$$\,$$$note$$$\,$$$that$$$\,$$$in$$$\,$$$the$$$\,$$$long-time$$$\,$$$limit,$$$\,$$$the$$$\,$$$overall$$$\,$$$kurtosis$$$\,$$$transverse$$$\,$$$to$$$\,$$$aligned$$$\,$$$impermeable$$$\,$$$axons$$$\,$$$asymptotically$$$\,$$$depends$$$\,$$$on$$$\,$$$the$$$\,$$$relative$$$\,$$$volume$$$\,$$$fractions[19,20], $$$\,$$$not$$$\,$$$on$$$\,$$$the$$$\,$$$axonal$$$\,$$$radii; $$$\,$$$our$$$\,$$$results$$$\,$$$are$$$\,$$$relevant$$$\,$$$in$$$\,$$$the$$$\,$$$intermediate-time$$$\,$$$regime.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the NYULH DART Microscopy Lab Alice Liang, Kristen Dancel-Manning and Chris Patzold for their expertise in electron microscopy work, Kirk Czymmek and Pal Pedersen from Carl Zeiss for their assistance of 3d EM data acquisition, Sune Jespersen for the discussion of diffusion theory, and High Performance Computing Center of New York University for numerical computations on the cluster. Research was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the NIH under award number R21 NS081230 and R01 NS088040, and was performed at the Center of Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R, www.cai2r.net), an NIBIB Biomedical Technology Resource Center (NIH P41 EB017183).

References

1. Baron CA, Kate M, Gioia L, Butcher K, Emery D, Budde M, Beaulieu C (2015) Reduction of Diffusion- Weighted Imaging Contrast of Acute Ischemic Stroke at Short Diffusion Times Stroke 46:2136- 2141 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008815

2. Shepherd, Gordon MG, and Morten Raastad. "Axonal varicosity distributions along parallel fibers: a new angle on a cerebellar circuit." The Cerebellum 2.2 (2003): 110-113.

3. Li P, Murphy TH (2008) Two-photon imaging during prolonged middle cerebral artery occlusion in mice reveals recovery of dendritic structure after reperfusion J Neurosci 28:11970-11979 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3724-08.2008

4. Shepherd GM, Raastad M, Andersen P (2002) General and variable features of varicosity spacing along unmyelinated axons in the hippocampus and cerebellum Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:6340-6345 doi:10.1073/pnas.052151299

5. Tang-Schomer MD, Johnson VE, Baas PW, Stewart W, Smith DH (2012) Partial interruption of axonal transport due to microtubule breakage accounts for the formation of periodic varicosities after traumatic axonal injury Exp Neurol 233:364-372 doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.10.030

6. Budde, Matthew D., and Joseph A. Frank. "Neurite beading is sufficient to decrease the apparent diffusion coefficient after ischemic stroke." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107.32 (2010): 14472-14477.

7. Lee, Hong-Hsi, et al. "Electron microscopy 3-dimensional segmentation and quantification of axonal dispersion and diameter distribution in mouse brain corpus callosum." bioRxiv(2018): 357491.

8. Assaf, Yaniv, et al. "AxCaliber: a method for measuring axon diameter distribution from diffusion MRI." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 59.6 (2008): 1347-1354.

9. Duval, Tanguy, et al. "In vivo mapping of human spinal cord microstructure at 300 mT/m." Neuroimage 118 (2015): 494-507.

10. Benjamini, Dan, et al. "White matter microstructure from nonparametric axon diameter distribution mapping." NeuroImage 135 (2016): 333-344.

11. Sepehrband, Farshid, et al. "Towards higher sensitivity and stability of axon diameter estimation with diffusion‐weighted MRI." NMR in Biomedicine 29.3 (2016): 293-308.

12. Ronen, Itamar, et al. "Microstructural organization of axons in the human corpus callosum quantified by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance spectroscopy of N-acetylaspartate and post-mortem histology." Brain Structure and Function 219.5 (2014): 1773-1785.

13. Callaghan, Paul T., et al. "Diffraction-like effects in NMR diffusion studies of fluids in porous solids." Nature 351.6326 (1991): 467.

14. Paul T. Callaghan. Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy. Oxford University Press on Demand, 1993.

15. Burcaw, Lauren M., Els Fieremans, and Dmitry S. Novikov. "Mesoscopic structure of neuronal tracts from time-dependent diffusion." NeuroImage 114 (2015): 18-37.

16. Fieremans, Els, et al. "In vivo observation and biophysical interpretation of time-dependent diffusion in human white matter." NeuroImage 129 (2016): 414-427.

17. Adams R, Bischof L (1994) Seeded Region Growing Ieee T Pattern Anal 16:641-647

18. Nilsson, Markus, et al. "The importance of axonal undulation in diffusion MR measurements: a Monte Carlo simulation study." NMR in Biomedicine 25.5 (2012): 795-805.

19. Fieremans, Els, et al. "Monte Carlo study of a two‐compartment exchange model of diffusion." NMR in Biomedicine 23.7 (2010): 711-724.

20. Fieremans, Els, Jens H. Jensen, and Joseph A. Helpern. "White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging." Neuroimage 58.1 (2011): 177-188.

Figures

Figure 1. 3d geometries of cylinders with periodic beads. The coefficient of variation of the radii, CV($$$r$$$), is labeled on top of each fiber.

Figure 2. Realistic microstructure of the intra-axonal space reconstructed from 3d scanning electron microscopy images of mouse brain genu of corpus callosum.

Figure 3. Simulation results of cylinders with periodic beads. (a) Simulated RD, $$$D_\perp(t)$$$, scales as $$$1/t$$$, and (b) simulated RK, $$$K_\perp(t)$$$, is constant over long diffusion times. (c) Effective radius, $$$r_{\rm{eff}}$$$, fitted based on simulations is consistent with theoretical predictions in Eq.(4). (d) RK in $$$t\to\infty$$$ limit, $$$K_\infty$$$, estimated based on simulations is consistent with theoretical predictions in Eq.(5). (e-f) Effective radius and RK in $$$t\to\infty$$$ limit increases with the strength of beading, CV($$$r$$$), except for $$$K_\infty$$$ when CV($$$r$$$)>0.4.

Figure 4. Simulation results of realistic intra-axonal space. (a) Simulated RD, $$$D_\perp(t)$$$, scales as $$$1/t$$$ for most of the axons, and (b) simulated RK, $$$K_\perp(t)$$$, gradually approaches to a constant at long times. (c) Effective radius, $$$r_{\rm{eff}}$$$, fitted based on simulations is slightly larger than theoretical predictions in Eq.(4), potentially due to the fiber undulations. (d) RK in $$$t\to\infty$$$ limit, $$$K_\infty$$$, estimated based on simulations is centered at about -0.2, c.f. -0.5 for a perfect cylinder. Markers in (c-d) are colored based on the value of the coefficient of variation of the radius, CV($$$r$$$).

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 27 (2019)
0650