Diffusion-weighted SSFP (dwSSFP) is a high-SNR-efficiency diffusion imaging method. Unlike conventional diffusion measurements, the dwSSFP signal reflects a range of diffusion times because the signal is recycled over multiple excitations. This complicates interpretation and leads to an ill-defined b-value. We present a framework to describe dwSSFP-derived ADC estimates in terms of an effective diffusion time. To achieve this, we require dwSSFP measurements at two flip-angles. Experimental results are presented in a whole, postmortem brain at 7T. This enables us to simultaneously addresses flip-angle inhomogeneity at 7T and provide ADC estimates that are more comparable to conventional diffusion MRI.
Diffusion-weighted steady-state free precession (dwSSFP) is a highly efficient diffusion-weighted imaging method. This efficiency results from a steady-state signal that recycles magnetisation over multiple excitations (i.e. there are multiple signal-forming coherence pathways). As a result of this signal-forming mechanism, the signal reflects a range of diffusion times, each with its own b-value. Moreover, each echo pathway has distinct T1 and T2 weighting, and the relative contribution of these pathways depends on flip-angle and TR, leading to a complicated signal dependence1 (Figure 1). dwSSFP has demonstrated higher SNR efficiency than spin echoes for imaging fixed, post-mortem tissue with very short T22. Further SNR benefits have been gained at 7T3, but require addressing flip-angle (B1) inhomogeneity. Previous work at 7T acquired dwSSFP images at two flip-angles, demonstrating improved homogeneity of principal diffusion direction (PDD) estimates4. However, that work encountered the additional challenge that the weighting of diffusion times is also flip-angle dependent5. Here, we turn this challenge into an opportunity: this dependence means that multiple flip-angle dwSSFP measurements can in theory be extrapolated to a single effective diffusion time, Δeff, making dwSSFP measurements more comparable to conventional diffusion measurements. We present a framework to obtain ADC estimates as a function of Δeff from multiple flip-angle dwSSFP data. Experimental validation is performed in a whole, postmortem brain.
The “two transverse approximation” of dwSSFP signal considers only coherence pathways where the magnetisation is in the transverse plane for two TR periods1,6, as a summation of pathways corresponding to one spin- and many stimulated-echoes: MADC=M0(1−E1)E1E22sinα2(1−E1cosα)(1−cosαE1⋅AADC+sin2α∞∑n=1[(E1cosα)n−1⋅An+1ADC])[1] where E1=e−TR/T1, E2=e−TR/T2, AADC=e−q2⋅ADC⋅TR, q is the area under the diffusion gradient, α is the flip-angle and n is the number of TRs between the transverse periods for a given stimulated-echo6.
The diffusion time of the signal is well
defined for each pathway (spin-echo: Δ=TR, stimulated-echo: Δ=(n+1)⋅TR). We define Δeff as the weighted-mean of these
diffusion times, with each echo weighted by its relative signal contribution, obtaining
(Figure 2): Δeff=(1+2E1−E21cosα)(1+E1)(1−E1cosα)⋅TR[2] The dependence of calculated diffusivity on
diffusion time reflects non-gaussian diffusion, which can be captured with a Gamma
distribution of diffusion coefficients7. For a given distribution,
we calculate the dwSSFP signal and translate this into a single ADC. For a Gamma
pdf of mean μ and standard deviation σ, this gives (Figure 3): ADC=−1q2TR⋅ln[−(S⋅E1cosα+1)+[(S⋅E1cosα+1)2+4E1⋅S]122E1][3] where: S=(μμ+q2⋅TR⋅σ2)μ2σ2+(1+cosα)⋅E1⋅(μq2⋅TR⋅σ2)μ2σ2⋅Φ(E1cosα,μ2σ2,2+μq2⋅TR⋅σ2)[4]
and Φ is the Lerch transcendent. As Eqs. [2] and [3] both depend on flip-angle, we can use measurements at multiple flip-angles to calculate the ADC for a target Δeff.
A fixed postmortem brain was scanned at 7T using a protocol described previously8. Briefly, the dwSSFP acquisition used flip-angles 24o and 94o, 120 directions per flip-angle, q=300/cm, resolution=0.85mm3, along with T1, T2 and B1 mapping. Diffusion-tensor (DT) estimates were calculated using the full dwSSFP signal model1,9, defining unique eigenvalues (L1,2,3) at each flip-angle, but shared eigenvectors (→V1,2,3). L1,2,3 estimates at each flip-angle were fit to Eq. [3] to determine μ and σ: min where regularisation ensured that \mu remains on the order of L_{1,2,3}.
The \mu and \sigma maps were subsequently input into Eq. [3], where we substituted \cos\alpha with an expression in terms of \Delta_{eff} (rearranging Eq. [2]) to obtain L_{1,2,3} estimates for \Delta_{eff}=200ms over the entire brain. \Delta_{eff}=200ms was selected due to the low diffusivity of postmortem tissue. Furthermore, it corresponds to \approx26o in our sample, an SNR-efficient flip-angle in dwSSFP.
Figure 4 reveals how L_{1,2,3} varies with B1 in the
postmortem brain. The reconstructed \Delta_{eff}=200ms maps (corresponding to \approx26o flip-angle) give good
agreement to the 24o dataset at high B1 whilst maintaining
a flatter distribution, highlighting the removal of B1-induced
ADC variability in our reconstruction. At 94o, we observe higher L_{1,2,3} estimates in B1 matched areas, in agreement with simulation (Figure
3).
However, little B1-influence is observed at 94o, suggesting a reduced ADC-sensitivity at high flip-angles (Figure
3).
The dwSSFP signal is SNR-efficient at low flip-angles1 (Figure 1). Figure 5 reveals that by extrapolating our dual flip-angle datasets to \Delta_{eff}=200ms, we are able to simultaneously preserve the SNR of the low flip-angle dataset whilst removing the influence of B1, generating results in terms of a single effective diffusion time over the entire brain.
1Buxton, Richard B. "The diffusion sensitivity of fast steady‐state free precession imaging." Magnetic resonance in medicine 29.2 (1993): 235-243.
2Miller, Karla L., et al. "Diffusion tractography of post-mortem human brains: optimization and comparison of spin echo and steady-state free precession techniques." Neuroimage 59.3 (2012): 2284-2297.
3Foxley, Sean, et al. "Improving diffusion-weighted imaging of post-mortem human brains: SSFP at 7 T." Neuroimage 102 (2014): 579-589.
4Foxley, Sean, et al. “Correcting for B1 inhomogeneities in post-mortem DWSSFP human brain data at 7T using multiple flip-angles.” 22nd Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med., 2014: #4438.
5Jbabdi, Saad, et al. “Modelling multiple flip-angle diffusion weighted SSFP data.” 23rd Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med., 2015: #2928.
6McNab, Jennifer A., and Karla L. Miller. "Sensitivity of diffusion weighted steady state free precession to anisotropic diffusion." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 60.2 (2008): 405-413.
7Jbabdi, Saad, et al. "Model‐based analysis of multishell diffusion MR data for tractography: How to get over fitting problems." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 68.6 (2012): 1846-1855.
8Pallebage-Gamarallage, Menuka, et al. "Dissecting the pathobiology of altered MRI signal in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A post mortem whole brain sampling strategy for the integration of ultra-high-field MRI and quantitative neuropathology." BMC neuroscience 19.1 (2018): 11.
9Hernandez-Fernandez Moises, et al. Using GPUs to accelerate computational diffusion MRI: From microstructure estimation to tractography and connectomes. BioRxiv. 2018
10McNab, Jennifer A., and Karla L. Miller. "Steady‐state diffusion‐weighted imaging: theory, acquisition and analysis." NMR in Biomedicine 23.7 (2010): 781-793.
11Jenkinson, Mark, et al. "Fsl." Neuroimage
62.2 (2012): 782-790.