Ricardo P. Martinho1, Qingjia Bao1, Stefan Markovic1, Dina Preise2, Keren Sasson2, Avigdor Scherz2, and Lucio Frydman1
1Department of Chemical and Biological Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel, 2The Moross Integrated Cancer Research Center, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Synopsis
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has a poor
prognosis. This study explored the use of a multimodal screening approach on a
preclinical mouse PDAC model that included T1 and T2 mapping, SPatiotemporal
ENcoding (SPEN) and EPI-based DWI, and MT methods, and hyperpolarized 13C
metabolic MRSI, to follow the progress of the disease from early on. Whereas T2
and MT were of little help, markedly decreased diffusivity, extended T1s and significantly
higher metabolic activities could be detected for large and small tumors alike.
These approaches could provide a translatable approach to the early noninvasive
detection of pancreatic cancer, leading to timely treatment.
Introduction
Despite strides in
cancer treatment, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains at a 5-year
survival rate lower than 5% –a rate nearly unaffected for a century and which makes
it the fourth major cause of cancer-related deaths.[1] This prognosis reflects PDAC’s
high metastatic index, coupled to a paucity of early detection methods.[2] By
contrast to what happens with other malignancies MR plays a relatively minor
role in detecting PDACs, which generally lack contrast vis-à-vis surrounding
tissues, and for which contrast agents do not extravasate efficiently. Evidences
of differentiated pancreatic cancer metabolism have recently been demonstrated
by Hyperpolarized MRSI.[3] Recent work has also shown potential correlations
between diffusion MRI (DWI) and tissue fibrosis [4] –yet these measurements are
uncertain when implemented using EPI in regions that, like the abdomen, are affected
by motions and close to fat/air/water interfaces. The goal of this work is to
explore the usefulness of emerging MRI forms, and in particular of robust DWI
approaches based on SPatiotemporal ENcoding (SPEN,[5]) to develop new contrasts
that can target this disease. DWI and DTI was complemented by relaxation (T1,
T2) and magnetization-transfer (MT) measurements as well as with hyperpolarized
13C metabolic imaging, in the search for a combination that might
serve as a toolkit for early-detection purposes. Results observed in a
preclinical model are here reported.Methods
Eight
male black mice bearing orthotopic PAN-2 PDAC and four naïve black control mice
were scanned. 1H MRI experiments were conducted either on 7 T magnets operated
by Varian consoles. 13C Hyperpolarization was conducted in an Oxford Instruments Hypersense operating at 94 GHz and 1.4K, and 13C MRSI measurements were carried out on a Bruker Biospec 4.7T scanner using a dual-tuned 1H/13C volume coil. See Captions for further details.
Results
PDAC tumors
could barely be identified by anatomical 1H MRI until after ca. 14
days post-implantation –a period henceforth called the early-detection stage. Different
1H MR contrasts were explored throughout this and later periods. Neither
T2 nor MT weighting/mapping could identify the tumor until weeks following implantation,
when it had already reached ≈1cm and was visible in the anatomic image (Figure
1). It has been reported that in humans,
pancreatic tumors have lower ADCs than surrounding tissue;[6] due to the
presence of motion, fat and air, however, EPI-based DWI measurements could
barely observe tumors on the basis of this behavior. Robust SPEN-based DWI
techniques, by contrast, could unambiguously observe in vivo PDACs in mice (Fig. 2), with isotropic diffusivities of ≈7x10-4
mm2s-1 compared to surrounding values of 1.1x10-3
mm2s-1. In addition (not shown) diffusion tensor
properties with specific alignment were detected by SPEN. This agreed with more
sensitive results collected in vitro on
surgically extracted tumors (Fig. 3), according to which both a reduced
diffusivity and kurtosis could be related to a dense, locally ordered
morphology revealed for the tumorous stroma by staining and microscopy. Interestingly,
the robustness of in vivo SPEN DWI experiments
successfully identified the tumors with their anomalously low ADCs, when these
were only ≈2 mm in diameter (Fig. 4A). The sole other 1H MRI
contrast that highlighted the presence of the tumor was the T1, which when
mapped lead to slightly longer values (≈1.45 s) than most of the tissues in the
abdominal region (0.9 s, Figure 4B).
In
addition to 1H measurements, MR’s competence to detect PDAC tumors was
assayed by injection of hyperpolarized 13C1-pyruvate. While 13C MRSI results were
characterized by much poorer spatial resolutions than 1H
counterparts, they could clearly identify the presence of even incipient tumors
by a large increase in the 13C1-lactate production (Fig.
5): The most intense lactate signals tended to originate from the approximate center
of the tumor, and a several-fold increase in the Lac/Pyr ratio were observed when
compared against ratios arising from other abdominal regions or from controls. Discussion & Conclusion
A comprehensive multimodal
exploration of contrasts for early PDAC detection was conducted in a murine
model. Three potentially translatable contrast sources were identified: SPEN-based
DWI/DTI, T1 mapping via Inversion Recovery, and hyperpolarized 13C MRSI. Findings
from these methods could jointly reveal the presence of PDAC even at an early
stage, when the tumor is small and treatable yet undetectable by anatomical 1H
images. It remains to be seen whether these tools can also highlight
malignancies in human cases, and whether they can distinguish malignancies from
pancreatic inflammations. Research into these avenues is currently in progress.Acknowledgements
This work was supported
by the Kimmel Institute for Magnetic Resonance (Weizmann Institute), the Israel
Science Foundation (grants 2508/17 and 965/18), a Thompson Family Foundation
grant, and the EU Horizon 2020 programme (Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant 642773).References
[1] E.S. Lee, and J.M. Lee. World J. Gastroenterol. 20 (2014) 7864.
[2] T. Yin et al. World J. Methodol. 7 (2017) 101.
[3] E.M Serrao et. al. GUT 65 (2016) 465.
[4] N. Farr et al. Cancer Med. 6 (2017) 1082.
[5] E. Solomon et al. JMR. 236 (2013) 76.
[6] N. Nissan et al. NMR Biomed. 30 (2017) e3728.
[7] Q. Bao et. al. ISMRM (2018) 0380.
[8] Q. Bao et. al. ISMRM (2018) 1021.
[9] L. Zhao et al. J Magn Reson B. 113 (1996) 179.