0327

Targeting brain and cognitive aging with multi-modal imaging and connectome topography profiling
Alexander J. Lowe1, Casey Paquola1, Reinder Vos de Wael1, Sara Lariviere1, Shahin Tavakol1, Benoit Caldairou2, Neda Bernasconi2, Andrea Bernasconi2, Nathan Spreng3, and Boris C. Bernhardt1

1Multimodal Imaging and Connectome Laboratory, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2Neuroimaging of Epilepsy Laboratory, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada, 3Brain and Cognition Laboratory, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada

Synopsis

We present an approach to represent and analyze age-related differences in cortical morphology and Aβ uptake based on connectome topography. Studying healthy individuals, we observed age-related reductions in neocortical thickness and atrophy across posterior hippocampal subfields. Additionally, we observed an interplay between aging effects and functional topography in both neocortical and hippocampal regions, with age-related thinning stronger towards unimodal regions and Aβ deposition increasing towards transmodal regions. Similarly, an inverted pattern of volume loss and Aβ deposition was observed along the hippocampal long-axis. Finally, imaging markers were found to predict cognitive performance in a topography-specific manner.

INTRODUCTION

Aging is a complex process involving the accumulation of structural and metabolic changes that ultimately lead to impairments across multiple cognitive domains [1]. With increasing availability of open-access and multi-modal data aggregation and dissemination initiatives, it is now possible to adopt an integrated approach, combining several imaging markers to better understand biological factors contributing to cognitive decline. Here, we present a novel analytical framework to visualize and analyze age-related changes in cortical morphology and amyloid-beta (Aβ) uptake, which represents cortical and hippocampal regions along a compact manifold derived from functional connectome topography, and to relate these data to cognitive profiles in healthy aging. Representing data in this manner assumes a gradual transition between networks, allowing for the effect of age to be accurately represented across the neocortical hierarchy and hippocampal long-axis, thus offering advantages over typical parcellation-based methods.

METHODS

Based on a subsample of the open-access Dallas Lifespan Cohort adults (n=102, 69 females, age range=30-89 years), we automatically segmented neocortical and allocortical hippocampal subfield surfaces on high-resolution T1-weighted MRI (3D MPRAGE, TR = 8.1ms, TE = 3.7ms, 1x1x1mm3) obtained in a 3T imaging dataset [2, 3] and co-registered the surface representations to PET-derived Aβ deposition data. Following statistical correction for education and sex, we built linear models to examine effects of age on thickness and partial volume corrected Aβ deposition on neocortical and hippocampal surfaces and to address associations to cognitive profiles. Cognitive profiles pertaining to fluid intelligence and episodic memory were derived from a common factor analysis of the neuropsychological data. In a second step, we reduced data dimensionality using resting-state functional connectome gradient information obtained in an independent dataset [4, 5], which allowed the representation of multimodal imaging profiles relative to neocortical functional topography and hippocampal long axis organization. Both gradients were discretized into 20 bins and the mean thickness and Aβ values were calculated within each bin. We assessed the relationship of age and cognitive factors with neuroimaging markers within each bin with FDR-corrected linear models.

RESULTS

Vertex-wise analysis revealed widespread age-related reductions in cortical thickness as well as posterior hippocampal atrophy across all subfields. Age-related increases in Aβ deposition were more confined, occurring primarily in limbic and default mode association cortices. Analysis of age effects along neocortical and hippocampal connectome gradients revealed diffuse thinning across the entire cortical gradient, with stronger effects in unimodal regions, whereas Aβ deposition showed an increase towards transmodal core hubs. A similar inverted effect was observed in the hippocampus, with volume loss observed posteriorly and increased Aβ deposition in anterior subregions. Regarding neuropsychological functioning, regional and gradient-wise findings were found to significantly predict factor-analytical markers of fluid intelligence and episodic memory.

DISCUSSION

Our findings build upon existing evidence indicative of structural and metabolic change with advancing age at the neocortical and hippocampal level. Notably, representing data in a novel and compact reference frame centered on functional transitions between systems reveals a striking dichotomy between the structural and metabolic biomarkers along the main axes of neocortical and hippocampal functional organization. These data are consistent with a hypothesized spatial topology of brain aging, wherein posterior structural degradation leads to increased activity in anterior brain regions [6] . Increased neural activity and metabolic demand may in turn lead to increased Aβ deposition, suggesting a structure-metabolic cascade leading to age-related cognitive decline.

CONCLUSION

This study presents a novel approach to represent age-related differences in brain structure, metabolism, and cognition. In addition to supporting previous work indicative of structural and metabolic change in the aging brain, the use of a compact analytical framework to relate brain-based biomarkers to macroscale functional systems allowed for novel insights into the interplay between pathological deposits and structural compromise, and how this subsequently impacts upon cognition in the healthy aging population.

Acknowledgements

We like to thank the investigators of the DLBS and associated funding sources for making their data available, and INDI/FCP1000 for hosting the imaging data. Reinder Vos de Wael MSc was supported by the McGill Faculty of Medicine. Sara Larivière MSc was supported by a Jeanne Timmins Costello Fellowship. Drs Neda and Andrea Bernasconi were funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and received salary support from the Fonds de la Recherche du Quebec – Santé (FRQS). Dr Boris Bernhardt acknowledges research support from the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC Discovery-1304413), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR FDN-154298), SickKids Foundation (NI17-039), as well as salary support from the Fonds de la Recherche du Quebec - Santé (FRQS Junior 1 Research Scholar).

References

[1]. Fjell, AM et al., 2016. Cerebral Cortex, 27(3).

[2]. Fischl, 2012. NeuroImage, 62(2).

[3]. Caldairou et al., 2016. MICCAI.

[4]. Margulies, DS et al., 2016. PNAS, 102(21).

[5]. Vos de Wael, R et al., 2018. PNAS, 115(40).

[6]. Davis et al., 2008. Cerebral Cortex, 18(5).

Figures

Analysis of grey matter morphology and Aβ deposition along neocortical (left) and hippocampal subfield (right) surfaces. Effects of age on A) cortical thickness and hippocampal volume across all subfields and B) on Aβ deposition. Models controlled for gender and education. Age related increases are shown in warm colors, decreases in cold colors. Regions significant at pFDR<0.025 are shown with black outlines, uncorrected trends relating to increased hippocampal Aβ are shown in semi-transparent (B, bottom right). The top row in each panel represents the respective mean values across the neocortex and hippocampus.

Associations between age-related brain markers and cognitive performance. A) Age of sample is displayed next to the matrix of standardized z-scores pertaining to all neuropsychological tests. Common factor analysis was employed to identify two latent factors pertaining to measures of fluid intelligence (F1) and episodic memory (F2), respectively. Both matrices have been age-ordered with red indicating higher scores and blue indicated lower scores. Significant negative correlations between age and F1 and F2 scores. B) Post-hoc correlation analysis, based on significant clusters of age-related cortical thickness, hippocampal volume and cortical amyloid deposition with F1 and F2.

Topographic profiling of age effects and cognitive correlations in neocortical and hippocampal regions. A) Age effects on cortical thickness and Aβ deposition (left), mapped to a reference space based on cortico-cortical functional connectivity gradients correlated with age (right). Primary sensory regions are situated towards the left and transmodal regions towards the right. B) Age-effects on hippocampal subregional volume and Aβ deposition (left), mapped to a reference space based on hippocampal-cortical functional connectivity, showing more elevated deposition in anterior subregions but more marked atrophy posteriorly. C) Gradient based stratification of correlations between F1 and F2 on cortical and hippocampal measures

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 27 (2019)
0327