Li Ma1,2,3, Chunxue Wu4, Shuo Zhang1,2, Zongze Li3, Lizhi Xie5, Xiaolin Chen1,2,3, Xun Ye1,2, Hao Wang1,2, Yuanli Zhao1,2,3, Shuo Wang1,2, and Jizong Zhao1,2
1Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China, 2China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China, 3Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China, 4Department of Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China, 5GE Healthcare, China, Beijing, China
Synopsis
Hemosiderin
deposits surrounding the cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) had been
proposed to be associated with the pathogenesis of CCM-related epilepsy (CRE).
An increased perilesional and extralesional iron deposition were found in CCMs
with epilepsy through
susceptibility maps of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). To
investigate novel biomarkers for the in vivo and longitudinal evaluation of CCM
lesions with epilepsy, this study was to explore the iron quantity in CCMs
patients with CRE using quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Introduction
Patients
with cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM) -related epilepsy (CRE) could not
always achieve seizure freedom after surgical resection of the lesion,
suggesting an inadequate treatment of the epileptogenic zone. Iron deposition
within cerebral cavernous malformations had been postulated to play an
important role in CRE. To demonstrate the relationship between hemosiderin deposits
surrounding the CCMs with the pathogenesis of CRE, quantitative susceptibility
mapping (QSM), considered to be the suitable imaging technique to in vivo
detection of brain iron deposition, was employed to analyze the iron quantity in
CCM patients with epilepsy.Methods
Twenty-five
patients harboring supratentorial CCM without surgery or radiation were
identified in 38 patients with CCMs undergoing QSM between September 2017 and
July 2018 in our institution. Imaging
was conducted on a 3T MR system (GE Healthcare) with an 8-channel head coil.
Parameters of QSM gradient echo images: TR/16TEs = 41.6/3.2 - 45.00 ms, voxel =
0.9 × 0.9 × 2.0 mm3, Max slices = 926, no gaps, average = 1, flip angle = 12°,
bandwidth = 62.50 Hz/pixel, FOV = 320 × 320 mm2, matrix = 256 × 256,
acquisition time = 7 min, 59 sec. The
magnetic susceptibility measurements were performed on the
susceptibility map co-registered with structural images. The regions of interest (ROIs) were
manually drawn on CCM leison, perilesional
T2 hypointensity rim, and extralesional brain with increased susceptibility
(>0.10 ppm, parts per million) on QSM (Fig.1). The distance between
perilesional T2 hypointensity rim and margin of extralesional brain with
increased susceptibility was measured in each slice of lesions (Fig.1). The
mean susceptibility of CCM leison,
perilesional T2 hypointensity rim, and extralesional brain with
increased susceptibility and mean distance of different slices of lesions were
further compared among patients with or without CRE by t test and two-way ANOVA.Results
CRE was observed in thirteen patients (48.0%,
12/25) (Table
1). The CCM lesions with epilepsy exhibited higher
mean susceptibility in perilesional T2 hypointensity rim (0.64±0.14
ppm) than those without (0.45±0.14
ppm, P=0.003) (Fig.2B). An
extralesional brain area surrounding CCM lesions exhibited increased mean
susceptibility, compared with remote cortex (seizure group: 0.34±0.14
ppm versus 0.05±0.006
ppm, P<0.0001; non-seizure group: 0.27±0.04
ppm versus 0.05±0.006
ppm, P<0.0001) (Fig. 2D). The distance
between T2 hypointensity rim and extralesional brain with increased
susceptibility was significantly longer in patients with CCM related-epilepsy (4.17 ±
0.37 mm versus 2.55 ±
0.35mm, P=0.01)
(Fig.2C). And there was a trend toward higher susceptibility within this
abnormal extralesional brain area in patients with epilepsy (0.34±0.14
ppm versus 0.27±0.04
ppm, P=0.13).Discussion
Patients with
CCM-related epilepsy (CRE) who undergo surgical resection achieve postoperative
seizure freedom in only about 70% of cases1,2. This is frequently due to insufficient efforts
made to adequately define and resect the epileptogenic zone4. Although hemosiderin
deposits surrounding the CCM has been proposed to be involved in the pathogenesis
of CRE, there was scarce evidence supporting a correlation between the presence
or size of the hemosiderin rim and epilepsy3. QSM
has been shown to provide reliable information on CCM related
to lesional iron deposition5. Our
preliminary data of QSM in CCM suggested a generally increased iron deposition
surrounding CCM lesions with or without epilepsy. However, a higher QSM of
hemosiderin rim and longer diameter of the extralesional iron deposition were
observed in CRE, suggesting that the quantity and area of hemosiderin deposits
were more likely to be associated with CRE, rather than the presence of
hemosiderin rim. In addition, our study might provide evidence for extended resection
in patients with CRE. Currently, the extension of excision including the
surrounding gliosis and hemosiderin fringe remains subject to controversy regarding
the outcome of seizure control, and the intraoperative resection extent of
hemosiderin rim was usually based on a subject judgment or image guide under
routine structural MRI. Our data suggested that future studies of QSM might be promising to develop
intraoperative tools for surgical resection or perioperative biomarkers for CRE control. Admittedly, it
was not feasible to illuminate the specific QSM features of CCM with distinct
epilepsy duration and lobar location, with the present sample size. Therefore,
further analysis in larger study population would individualize our current
findings.Conclusions
QSM
revealed increased perilesional and extralesional iron deposition in CCMs with
epilepsy. These novel biomarkers might improve the in vivo and longitudinal
evaluation of CCM lesions with epilepsy. Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants to Dr.
Li Ma from National Natural Science Foundation of China (H0906 81801140).References
1. Dammann P, Wrede K, Jabbarli R, Neuschulte
S, Menzler K, Zhu Y, et al: Outcome after conservative management or surgical
treatment for new-onset epilepsy in cerebral cavernous malformation. J Neurosurg 126:1303-1311, 2017.
2. Englot DJ, Han SJ, Lawton MT, Chang EF:
Predictors of seizure freedom in the surgical treatment of supratentorial
cavernous malformations. J Neurosurg
115:1169-1174, 2011.
3. Menzler K, Chen X, Thiel P, Iwinska-Zelder
J, Miller D, Reuss A, et al: Epileptogenicity of cavernomas depends on (archi-)
cortical localization. Neurosurgery 67:918-924,
2010.
4. Rosenow F, Alonso-Vanegas MA, Baumgartner
C, Blumcke I, Carreno M, Gizewski ER, et al: Cavernoma-related epilepsy: review
and recommendations for management--report of the Surgical Task Force of the
ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies. Epilepsia
54:2025-2035, 2013.
5. Tan H, Liu T, Wu Y, Thacker J, Shenkar R,
Mikati AG, et al: Evaluation of iron content in human cerebral cavernous
malformation using quantitative susceptibility mapping. Invest Radiol 49:498-504, 2014