0164

Diffusion MRI in the unfolded hippocampus
Uzair Hussain1, Jordan DeKraker1,2,3, Corey A. Baron1,2,4,5, and Ali R. Khan1,2,4,5

1Centre for Functional and Metabolic Mapping, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada, 2Neuroscience Graduate Program, Western University, London, ON, Canada, 3The Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada, 4Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada, 5School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, ON, Canada

Synopsis

The hippocampus is of high interest to the research community due to its involvement in many neurological disorders. However, in-vivo imaging, particularly diffusion weighted imaging, is challenging due to the hippocampus’ complicated curved geometry and small size. We address these challenges with an approach that ‘unfolds’ the hippocampus into a thin sheet. This allows migration of the diffusion data into this unfolded hippocampus, which enables visualization of microstructural sensitive diffusion parameters in a space where hippocampal subfields can be readily distinguished.

Introduction

The hippocampus is implicated in numerous neurological disorders, including temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and the ability to detect subtle or focal hippocampal abnormalities earlier could significantly improve the treatment of patients. Ex vivo studies with ultra-high field have revealed that diffusion MRI (dMRI) can reveal microstructural variations within the hippocampal subfields and lamina, and may also be sensitive to intra-hippocampal pathways 1. However, in vivo dMRI studies of the hippocampus are challenging due to its complicated geometry. In addition to its small size, the hippocampus, similar to the cortex, shows gyrification (or digitations) across its structure. Further, the hippocampus has a curled or folded configuration. One novel way to overcome these obstacles is by transforming the usual cartesian coordinates in a MRI image to coordinates that are mathematically crafted to curve themselves according to the complicated geometry of the hippocampus 2. This allows us to virtually flatten the hippocampus into a thin sheet. A particularly unique aspect of our proposed approach is to project the diffusion data onto this sheet, carefully adjusting the diffusion directions from the original acquisition to be compatible with the sheet.

Methods

We used data from four participants in the Human Connectome Project (HCP) Young Adult 3T study 3. We begin by a manual segmentation of both hippocampi. This is followed by solving Laplace’s equation, $$$\nabla^2 \phi =0$$$, in 3-dimensions on the underlying cartesian grid with coordinates $$$x,y$$$ and $$$z$$$ native to the MRI scan; denoted the ‘native space’. The Laplace’s equation is solved three times to provide three new anatomical coordinates $$$u, v$$$ and $$$w$$$, using boundary conditions as depicted in Figure 1a. The resulting coordinate fields are shown in Figure 1b,c,d, where bright yellow is 1 and dark blue is 0. Next, we reparameterize the new coordinates with the arc length. At this stage we can ‘unfold’ the hippocampus by going in to the domain of the new coordinates, the ‘unfolded space’. The coordinate fields $$$u(x,y,z)$$$, $$$v(x,y,z)$$$ and $$$w(x,y,z)$$$ allow us to map data from the native space to the unfolded space. The novel contribution in this work is to also map vector data to the unfolded space, which is essential for properly handling diffusion gradient directions. We use the Jacobian to correctly ‘push’ the diffusion directions and corresponding signal intensities to the the unfolded space. This allows us to generate a diffusion-weighted volume, resampled in the unfolded space, with the Jacobian encoding the unfolding transformation. Several existing tools for fitting already can make use of a Jacobian to account for gradient non-linearities (e.g. FSL FDT 4), and thus can be used directly for fitting and tractography in the unfolded space. We utilized the inherent correspondence across subjects in the unfolded space to define subfield labels in our participants using average labels defined previously at 7T2. We used these to perform probabilistic tractography (FSL PROBTRACKX 5), all voxels were taken as seeds tagged with the subfield they belong to and 5000 samples were used.

Results

The visualizations of fibre orientation maps in Figure 2 demonstrates how unfolding provides an holistic visualization of the entire extent of the hippocampus, and reveals patterns in fibre orientation and anisotropy that are more difficult to discern in the native space. A validation of the ability of the unfolding approach to preserve orientation information is shown in Figure 3, with angle errors from fits in the native space compared to fits performed in unfolded space and mapped back to the native space. Figure 4 shows that fractional anisotropy has some subfield specificity, with subiculum significantly different than all other subfields. Figure 5 shows the intra-hippocampal connectivity for all 8 hippocampi, revealing consistent patterns that are consistent with connections related to the tri-synaptic pathway.

Discussion


A benefit of the unfolded space is that the orthogonal axes now represent anatomically relevant axes: longitudinal (anterior to posterior), laminar (deep to superficial), and lamellar (proximal to distal). These are notably the axes in which axonal projections generally follow anatomically, so tractography in this space could be constrained more effectively. This advantage could also be employed to inform novel microstructural models of cortical tissue, which future work will explore. One limitation of the current work is the need for manual segmentations, and thus was limited to a small number of subjects, however, semi-automated methods are currently in development, and this technique can also be applied more generally to any cortical structure.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a BrainsCAN Stimulus grant from the Canada First Research Excellence Fund, Brain Canada, and a Project Grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). We thank Kayla Ferko for assisting with hippocampal subfield segmentation.

References

1. Beaujoin, J., Palomero-Gallagher, N., Boumezbeur, F., Axer, M., Bernard, J., Poupon, F., Schmitz, D., Mangin, J.-F. & Poupon, C. Post-mortem inference of the human hippocampal connectivity and microstructure using ultra-high field diffusion MRI at 11.7 T. Brain Struct. Funct. 223, 2157–2179 (2018).

2. DeKraker, J., Ferko, K. M., Lau, J. C., Köhler, S. & Khan, A. R. Unfolding the hippocampus: An intrinsic coordinate system for subfield segmentations and quantitative mapping. Neuroimage 167, 408–418 (2018).

3. Van Essen, D. C., Smith, S. M., Barch, D. M., Behrens, T. E. J., Yacoub, E., Ugurbil, K. & WU-Minn HCP Consortium. The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview. Neuroimage 80, 62–79 (2013).

4. Behrens, T. E. J., Woolrich, M. W., Jenkinson, M., Johansen-Berg, H., Nunes, R. G., Clare, S., Matthews, P. M., Brady, J. M. & Smith, S. M. Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 50, 1077–1088 (2003).

5. Behrens, T. E. J., Berg, H. J., Jbabdi, S., Rushworth, M. F. S. & Woolrich, M. W. Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? Neuroimage 34, 144–155 (2007).

Figures

Fig 1. The first panel a) shows the locations of the regions chosen for boundary conditions, for e.g., when solving for the $$$u$$$ coordinate we choose the source as $$$U_0$$$, sink as $$$U_1$$$ and Neumann boundary conditions for the other boundaries. The subsequent three panels (b), c) & d)) show the solution to Laplace’s equation for each of the coordinates u, v and w.

Fig 2. Sagittal (a), coronal (b) and axial (c) slices of a T2 weighted image cropped around the left hippocampus. The colored sticks show fiber orientations resulting from a ball and stick fit where green represents the anterior to posterior direction, red represents right to left and blue inferior to superior. Panel d shows the ball and stick fit in the unfolded space with the sticks modulated by the fractional anisotropy. Here red shows anterior to posterior, green proximal to distal and blue in/out of page.

Fig 3. The angle difference between sticks fit from BEDPOST in unfolded space with sticks fit in native space. The sticks from the unfolded space are mapped back to the native space by using the Jacobian and then compared with the native space sticks. Notice the peak at zero indicating that there is general agreement with fits performed in the unfolded space. Decreased correspondence for angles less than 30 is expected as ball & stick modelling performs poorly for small angles.

Fig 4. Panel a) shows the distribution of FA values in each subfield of one hippocampus. Panel b) shows the automated subfield segmentation and the FA values. Panel c) shows a box plot of the average FA value from each subfield as measured from four left hippocampi. Pairs where the mean FA is significantly different (Tukey-Kramer with alpha of 0.05) are shown with an asterisk.

Fig 5. Intra and inter connectivity of the subfields in all 4 participants. The columns are participants and rows are left and right hippocampi. The full connectivity matrix is calculated by using probabilistic tracking and then average values are obtained for each subfield. The average calculated by first averaging the weights over all connections for each vertex and then averaging that quantity over all vertices in a subfield. Notice that we see connections consistent with the trisynaptic circuit consistently amongst all subjects.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 27 (2019)
0164